...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >Economic potential of fuel recycling options: A lifecycle cost analysis of future nuclear system transition in China
【24h】

Economic potential of fuel recycling options: A lifecycle cost analysis of future nuclear system transition in China

机译:燃料回收方案的经济潜力:中国未来核系统转型的生命周期成本分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In today's profit-driven market, how best to pursue advanced nuclear fuel cycle technologies while maintaining the cost competitiveness of nuclear electricity is of crucial importance to determine the implementation of spent fuel reprocessing and recycling in China. In this study, a comprehensive techno-economic analysis is undertaken to evaluate the economic feasibility of ongoing national projects and the technical compatibility with China's future fuel cycle transition. We investigated the dynamic impacts of technical and economic uncertainties in the lifecycle of a nuclear system. The electricity generation costs associated with four potential fuel cycle transition scenarios were simulated by probabilistic and deterministic approaches and then compared in detail. The results showed that the total cost of a once-through system is lowest compared those of other advanced systems involving reprocessing and recycling. However, thanks to the consequential uncertainties caused by the further progress toward technology maturity, the economic potential of fuel recycling options was proven through a probabilistic uncertainty analysis. Furthermore, it is recommended that a compulsory executive of closed fuel cycle policy would pose some investment risk in the near term, though the execution of a series of R & D initiatives with a flexible roadmap would be valuable in the long run.
机译:在当今以利润为导向的市场中,如何最好地追求先进的核燃料循环技术,同时保持核电的成本竞争力,对于确定在中国实施乏燃料后处理和再循环至关重要。在这项研究中,进行了全面的技术经济分析,以评估正在进行的国家项目的经济可行性以及与中国未来燃料循环过渡的技术兼容性。我们研究了技术和经济不确定性对核系统生命周期的动态影响。通过概率和确定性方法模拟了与四个潜在燃料循环过渡方案相关的发电成本,然后进行了详细比较。结果表明,与其他涉及后处理和回收的先进系统相比,直通式系统的总成本最低。但是,由于技术成熟度的进一步提高导致了不确定性,因此通过概率不确定性分析证明了燃料回收方案的经济潜力。此外,建议强制执行封闭式燃料循环政策的执行者在短期内会带来一些投资风险,尽管从长远来看,执行一系列具有灵活路线图的研发计划很有价值。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy Policy》 |2017年第2期|526-536|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Korea Univ Sci & Technol, 217 Gajeong Ro, Daejeon 305353, South Korea|Korea Atom Energy Res Inst, Nonproliferat Syst Res Div, 989-111 Daedeok Daero, Daejeon 305353, South Korea;

    Ulsan Natl Inst Sci & Technol, Sch Mech & Nucl Engn, UNIST Gil 50, Ulsan 689798, South Korea;

    Korea Atom Energy Res Inst, Nonproliferat Syst Res Div, 989-111 Daedeok Daero, Daejeon 305353, South Korea;

    Korea Atom Energy Res Inst, Nonproliferat Syst Res Div, 989-111 Daedeok Daero, Daejeon 305353, South Korea;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Levelized cost; Fuel cycle transition; Probabilistic approach; Spent nuclear fuel management;

    机译:成本平均化;燃油循环过渡;概率方法;乏核燃料管理;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号