首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >A novel approach for analyzing the effectiveness of the R&D capital for resource conservation: Comparative study on Germany and UK electricity sectors
【24h】

A novel approach for analyzing the effectiveness of the R&D capital for resource conservation: Comparative study on Germany and UK electricity sectors

机译:一种分析资源保护研发资本的有效性的新方法:德国和英国电力部门的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Limited access to energy resources and increasing demand for mitigation of the environmental impacts have necessitated higher production efficiencies. Therefore, the promotion of R&D activities has been one of the main parts of national energy policies. In this research work, two methods are used for assessing the effectiveness of the R&D capital on resource conservation. First, by developing the resource-included knowledge production function of the energy sector and second, through direct assessment of the functionality of resource productivity from R&D capital. Based on official data provided by national statistical centers, a comparative analysis has been conducted to examine the effectiveness of R&D in the electricity generation sectors in the United Kingdom and Germany. In these analyses, non-renewable exergy cost is used as an index of resource depletion and environmental burden. It is shown that, due to non-economic energy transition policies, the inclusion of the R&D investment does not result in statistically meaningful elasticity of production for the R&D capital. However, according to the second method, it is shown that the R&D investment in the United Kingdom has been more effective in resource conservation than in Germany. Possible reasons for such differences are discussed and recommendations for further investigations are presented.
机译:有限地获得能源资源和越来越缓解对环境影响的需求所需的生产效率更高。因此,促进研发活动是国家能源政策的主要部分之一。在本研究工作中,两种方法用于评估研发资本对资源保护的有效性。首先,通过开发能源部门的资源知识生产函数,并通过直接评估研发资本资源生产率的功能。基于国家统计中心提供的官方数据,已经进行了比较分析,以研究英国和德国发电部门研发的有效性。在这些分析中,不可再生的漏洞成本被用作资源消耗和环境负担的指标。结果表明,由于非经济能源转型政策,纳入研发投资不会导致研发资本生产的统计上有意义的弹性。然而,根据第二种方法,表明英国的研发投资在资源范围内比德国更有效。讨论了这种差异的可能原因,并提出了进一步调查的建议。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy Policy》 |2020年第12期|111792.1-111792.16|共16页
  • 作者单位

    Sharif Univ Technol Energy Engn Dept Tehran Iran|Tech Univ Berlin Inst Energy Engn Marchstr 18 D-10587 Berlin Germany;

    Sharif Univ Technol Grad Sch Management & Econ Tehran Iran;

    Sharif Univ Technol Energy Engn Dept Tehran Iran;

    Tech Univ Berlin Inst Energy Engn Marchstr 18 D-10587 Berlin Germany;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Energy; Nonrenewable exergy cost; RD; Environment; Resource conservation;

    机译:能量;不可再生的漏洞成本;研发;环境;资源保护;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 22:23:20

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号