...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >The long-term impacts of carbon and variable renewable energy policies on electricity markets
【24h】

The long-term impacts of carbon and variable renewable energy policies on electricity markets

机译:碳和可变可再生能源政策对电力市场的长期影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We present a computationally-efficient optimization model that finds the least-cost generation unit expansion, commitment, and dispatch plan to serve hourly electricity demand and ancillary service requirements. We apply the model to a case study based on data from the electricity market in Texas (ERCOT) to analyze the market and investment impacts of several incentive mechanisms that support variable renewable energy (VRE) investments and carbon emission reductions. In contrast to many previous studies, the model determines least-cost VRE investments under different cost and incentive assumptions rather than analyzing scenarios where VRE expansion is pre-determined. We find that electricity prices can vary significantly under different incentive mechanisms, even when comparable generation portfolios result. Therefore, the preferred incentive mechanism depends on stakeholder objectives as well as the prevailing electricity market framework. Our results indicate that a carbon tax is more system cost-efficient for reducing emissions, while production and investment tax credits are more system cost-efficient for increasing VRE investments. Similarly, incentive mechanisms that reduce electricity prices may increase the need for separate revenue sufficiency mechanisms (e.g. a capacity market) more than a policy that increases electricity prices. Moreover, the impacts on consumer payments are not always aligned with changes in system costs. Overall, the analysis illustrates the importance of considering electricity market impacts in assessing the economic efficiency of VRE and carbon incentive mechanisms.
机译:我们提出了一种计算有效的优化模型,该模型可找到成本最低的发电单元扩展,承诺和调度计划,以满足每小时的用电需求和辅助服务需求。我们将模型应用到基于得克萨斯州电力市场(ERCOT)数据的案例研究中,以分析支持可变可再生能源(VRE)投资和碳减排的几种激励机制对市场和投资的影响。与许多以前的研究相比,该模型在不同的成本和激励假设下确定成本最低的VRE投资,而不是分析预先确定VRE扩展的情况。我们发现,即使产生可比较的发电量,在不同的激励机制下电价也可能有很大差异。因此,首选的激励机制取决于利益相关者的目标以及当前的电力市场框架。我们的结果表明,碳税对于减少排放更具系统成本效益,而生产和投资税收抵免对于增加VRE投资则更具系统成本效益。同样,降低电价的激励机制可能比增加电价的政策更多地增加对单独的收入充足机制(例如,容量市场)的需求。此外,对消费者付款的影响并不总是与系统成本的变化保持一致。总体而言,该分析表明在评估VRE和碳激励机制的经济效率时,考虑电力市场影响的重要性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy Policy》 |2019年第8期|53-71|共19页
  • 作者单位

    Argonne Natl Lab, Energy Syst Div, Ctr Energy Environm & Econ Syst Anal, 9700 S Cass Ave, Argonne, IL 60439 USA;

    Argonne Natl Lab, Energy Syst Div, Ctr Energy Environm & Econ Syst Anal, 9700 S Cass Ave, Argonne, IL 60439 USA;

    Argonne Natl Lab, Energy Syst Div, Ctr Energy Environm & Econ Syst Anal, 9700 S Cass Ave, Argonne, IL 60439 USA|MIT, Inst Data Syst & Soc, Lab Informat & Decis Syst, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Renewable energy policy; Carbon policy; Electricity markets; Variable renewable energy; Expansion planning; Production cost modeling;

    机译:可再生能源政策;碳政策;电力市场;可变可再生能源;扩张计划;生产成本建模;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号