首页> 外文期刊>The Energy Journal >Unintended Consequences of Carbon Policies: Transportation Fuels, Land-Use, Emissions, and Innovation
【24h】

Unintended Consequences of Carbon Policies: Transportation Fuels, Land-Use, Emissions, and Innovation

机译:碳政策的意外后果:运输燃料,土地使用,排放和创新

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Renewable fuel standards, low carbon fuel standards, and ethanol subsidies are popular policies to incentivize ethanol production and reduce emissions from transportation. Compared to carbon trading, these policies lead to large shifts in agricultural activity and unexpected social costs. We simulate the 2022 Federal Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) and find that energy crop production increases by 39 million acres. Land-use costs from erosion and habitat loss are between $277 and $693 million A low carbon fuel standard (LCFS) and ethanol subsidies have similar effects while costs under an equivalent cap and trade (CAT) system are essentially zero. In addition, the alternatives to CAT magnify errors in assigning emissions rates to fuels and can over or under-incentivize innovation. These results highlight the potential negative effects of the RFS, LCFS and subsidies, effects that would be less severe under a CAT policy.
机译:可再生燃料标准,低碳燃料标准和乙醇补贴是鼓励乙醇生产和减少运输排放的普遍政策。与碳交易相比,这些政策导致农业活动发生了巨大变化,并带来了意想不到的社会成本。我们模拟了2022年的联邦可再生燃料标准(RFS),发现能源作物的产量增加了3900万英亩。侵蚀和生境丧失带来的土地使用成本在277美元至6.93亿美元之间。低碳燃料标准(LCFS)和乙醇补贴具有类似的效果,而在同等限额和交易(CAT)系统下的成本基本上为零。此外,CAT的替代方案会放大分配燃料排放率的错误,并可能过度或不足地刺激创新。这些结果凸显了RFS,LCFS和补贴的潜在负面影响,这种影响在《禁止酷刑公约》政策下不会那么严重。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号