首页> 外文期刊>Energy & fuels >Measurement of Cracking Kinetics of Pure Model Compounds by Thermogravimetric Analysis
【24h】

Measurement of Cracking Kinetics of Pure Model Compounds by Thermogravimetric Analysis

机译:用热重分析法测定纯模型化合物的裂解动力学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Determination of cracking kinetics by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) is attractive but requires careful experimental design to ensure consistent results. Here, we examine three methods for determining kinetic parameters by TGA: differential analysis at a constant heating rate (differential), temperature for constant conversion at multiple heating rates (isoconversional), and maximum rate at multiple heating rates (peak temperature). The test compounds used in this study are based on pyrene, with boiling points high enough that mass loss was dominated by the reaction rather than evaporation. The methods using multiple heating rates gave comparable results to each other but were very different from the results from the differential method. The results of the differential method were insensitive to the heating rate and consistent with kinetics of cracking reported in the literature for similar structures. The differential analysis method for cracking of model compounds was the best approach, because the methods of multiple heating rates consumed more sample and were reported in the literature to be very sensitive to minor experimental errors. The conversion in a microreactor experiment was accurately predicted using the kinetics from the differential TGA method, suggesting a consistent reaction rate in these two different reactions. Hence, the differential approach was concluded to be much more accurate when compared to isoconversional and peak temperature methods.
机译:通过热重分析(TGA)确定开裂动力学很有吸引力,但需要仔细的实验​​设计以确保结果一致。在这里,我们研究了三种通过TGA确定动力学参数的方法:在恒定加热速率(差)下进行差异分析,在多个加热速率下进行恒定转化的温度(等转化)和在多个加热速率下达到最大速率(峰值温度)的方法。本研究中使用的测试化合物基于pyr,其沸点足够高,以致质量损失由反应而非蒸发决定。使用多种加热速率的方法彼此可以得到可比较的结果,但与差分方法的结果有很大不同。差分法的结果对加热速率不敏感,并且与文献中报道的类似结构的开裂动力学一致。裂解模型化合物的差异分析方法是最好的方法,因为多种加热速率的方法消耗了更多的样品,并且文献报道对微小的实验误差非常敏感。使用差示TGA方法的动力学可以准确预测微反应器实验中的转化率,表明这两种不同反应的反应速率一致。因此,与等温转换和峰值温度方法相比,差分方法的结论是更加准确。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy & fuels》 |2010年第julaaauga期|p.3998-4004|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering;

    Department of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2V4, Canada;

    Friedrich-Alexander-Universitat Erlangen-Nurnberg, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany;

    Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号