首页> 外文期刊>Energy & fuels >Simulation-Based Evaluation of a Two-Stage Small-Scale Methanation Unit for Decentralized Applications
【24h】

Simulation-Based Evaluation of a Two-Stage Small-Scale Methanation Unit for Decentralized Applications

机译:用于分散应用的两阶段小型甲烷化装置的基于仿真的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The present work aims for a simulation-based evaluation of a two-stage methanation unit for the production of substitute natural gas (SNG) in decentralized small-scale applications with low complexity. Equilibrium calculations reveal a remarkable impact of CO2 removal efficiency on final SNG composition with an optimum removal efficiency of 85% for the examined synthesis gas. The first methanation stage consists of a polytropic fixed-bed methanation reactor and is implemented as a one-dimensional pseudohomogeneous model in Aspen PIus (TM) with reaction kinetics from literature. The comparison of three different kinetic models reveals that reverse reaction of CO methanation has to be considered in the kinetic rate equations for appropriate modeling within a dynamic temperature range above 400 degrees C in case of polytropic reactors. The first methanation stage is examined with one kinetic model in terms of reactor geometry, varying GHSV and influence of the feed gas composition to determine limits in upscaling and avoidance of too high temperatures. A significant decrease of the reactor diameter favors the heat removal in case of polytropic reactor concept, whereas a higher GHSV causes higher outlet temperatures. The results show that an effective operation of the proposed methanation concept is limited by an appropriate heat removal.
机译:本工作旨在基于模拟的两级甲烷化装置的评估,该装置可用于低复杂度的分散式小规模应用中生产代用天然气(SNG)。平衡计算显示,CO2去除效率对最终SNG组成有显着影响,对于所检查的合成气,最佳去除效率为85%。第一甲烷化阶段由多相固定床甲烷化反应器组成,在Aspen PIus(TM)中以文献中的反应动力学实现为一维伪均质模型。三种不同动力学模型的比较表明,对于多方反应堆,在高于400摄氏度的动态温度范围内,必须在动力学速率方程中考虑CO甲烷化的逆反应才能进行适当建模。用一个动力学模型检查第一甲烷化阶段的反应器几何形状,变化的GHSV和进料气体组成的影响,以确定扩大规模的上限和避免过高的温度。在多方反应堆概念的情况下,反应堆直径的显着减小有利于散热,而较高的GHSV会导致较高的出口温度。结果表明,所提出的甲烷化概念的有效运行受到适当排热的限制。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy & fuels》 |2017年第2期|2076-2086|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Chair Energy Proc Engn, Further Str 244f, D-90429 Nurnberg, Germany;

    Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Chair Energy Proc Engn, Further Str 244f, D-90429 Nurnberg, Germany;

    DBFZ Deutsch Biomasseforschungszentrum GmbH, Torgauer Str 116, D-04347 Leipzig, Germany|Ernst Abbe Hsch Jena, Carl Zeiss Promenade 2, D-07745 Jena, Germany;

    Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Chair Energy Proc Engn, Further Str 244f, D-90429 Nurnberg, Germany;

    Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Chair Energy Proc Engn, Further Str 244f, D-90429 Nurnberg, Germany;

    Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Chair Energy Proc Engn, Further Str 244f, D-90429 Nurnberg, Germany;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:39:29

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号