首页> 外文期刊>Energy efficiency >Drivers and barriers to the diffusion of energy-efficient technologies-a plant-level analysis of the German steel industry
【24h】

Drivers and barriers to the diffusion of energy-efficient technologies-a plant-level analysis of the German steel industry

机译:节能技术推广的驱动因素和障碍-德国钢铁行业的工厂级分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The paper aims at explaining why large-scale energy-intensive industries-here the German iron and steel industry-had a period of slow uptake of major energy-efficient technologies from the mid 1990s to mid 2000s (Arens and Worrell, 2014) and why from the mid 2000s onwards these technologies are increasingly implemented again. We analyze the underlying factors and investment/innovation behavior of individual firms in the German iron and steel industry to better understand barriers and drivers for technological change. The paper gives insights on the decision-making process on energy efficiency in firms and helps to understand how policy affects decision-making. We use a mixed method approach. First, we analyze the diffusion of three energy-efficient technologies (EET) for primary steelmaking from their introduction until today (top-pressure recovery turbine (TRT), basic oxygen furnace gas recovery (BOFGR), and pulverized coal injection (PCI)). We derive the uptake of these technologies both at the national level and at the level of the individual firm. Second, we analyze the impact of drivers and barriers on the decision-making process of individual firms whether or not they want to implement these technologies. Economics and access to capital are the foremost barriers to the uptake of an EET. If the expected payback period exceeds a certain value or if the company lacks capital, investments in EET seem not to happen. But even if an EET is economically viable and the company has access to capital, investments in EET might not be realized. Policy-induced prices might have strengthened the recent diffusion of TRT. We found indications that in a limited number of cases, policy intervention was a driving factor. Technical risks and imperfect information are only marginal factors in our cases. Site-specific factors seem to be important, as site-specific factors shape the economics of the selected EET.
机译:本文旨在解释为什么从1990年代中期到2000年代中期,大型能源密集型行业(这里是德国钢铁行业)对主要节能技术的吸收缓慢(Arens and Worrell,2014),以及为什么从2000年代中期开始,这些技术再次得到越来越多的实施。我们分析了德国钢铁行业中各个公司的潜在因素和投资/创新行为,以更好地了解技术变革的障碍和动因。本文提供了有关企业能源效率决策过程的见解,并有助于了解政策如何影响决策。我们使用混合方法。首先,我们分析了从初级炼钢问世到今天的三种节能技术(EET)的扩散情况(顶压回收涡轮机(TRT),基本氧气炉煤气回收(BOFGR)和粉煤喷射(PCI)) 。我们在国家层面和个体企业层面上都采用了这些技术。其次,我们分析了驱动程序和障碍对单个公司的决策过程的影响,无论它们是否要实施这些技术。经济学和获取资本是采用EET的首要障碍。如果预期的投资回收期超过一定值,或者公司缺乏资本,则似乎不会进行EET投资。但是,即使EET在经济上可行并且公司可以使用资本,也可能无法实现对EET的投资。政策导致的价格可能加强了TRT的近期传播。我们发现有迹象表明,在少数情况下,政策干预是驱动因素。技术风险和不完善的信息只是我们案例中的边缘因素。特定地点的因素似乎很重要,因为特定地点的因素影响着所选EET的经济性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号