...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy efficiency >German and Norwegian policy approach to residential buildings' energy efficiency-a comparative assessment
【24h】

German and Norwegian policy approach to residential buildings' energy efficiency-a comparative assessment

机译:德国和挪威的住宅建筑能效政策方法-比较评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Buildings in private and domestic use are responsible for about 30% of the global greenhouse gas emissions attributable mainly to their need for heating and cooling energy. This corresponds to about 40% of the global final energy consumption. Therefore, a viable implementation of building energy efficiency policies is inevitable to realize a transformation of the energy system to mitigate climate change. Within the building sector lies a huge potential for emission reduction consisting in the renovation of the existing building stock and climate-friendly building guidelines applicable to new constructions, both adapting CO~(2)-neutral technology solutions. However, as there are several different pathways leading to a decarbonized energy system, there is always the question which political and technological solutions are most efficient, effective, and feasible. This paper aims to analyze building efficiency policy measures and instruments and the related technological solutions in two front-runner countries of the energy transition, possessing different structural conditions: Germany and Norway. We hence apply a comparative approach which allows us to present and assess the policies in place. The paper answers three research questions: (1) Which policies prevail in Germany and Norway to foster the deployment of energy efficient and decarbonized solutions for residential buildings? (2) How do these policies respond to country-specific barriers to the energy transition in the building sector, and (3) What effects do they have on the actual implementation of technological and societal solutions? This research provides a new insight to the highly relevant topic of energy efficiency in buildings in the context of international Intended Nationally Determined Contribution benchmarking and discusses some unsolved trade-offs in the translation of the global climate governance into the national building sector.
机译:私人和家庭使用的建筑物约占全球温室气体排放量的30%,这主要归因于其对供暖和制冷能源的需求。这约占全球最终能源消耗的40%。因此,不可避免地要切实执行建筑节能政策,以实现能源系统的转型以缓解气候变化。建筑领域内具有巨大的减排潜力,其中包括对现有建筑材料的翻新和适用于新建筑的气候友好型建筑准则,这两种技术均适用于CO〜(2)中性技术解决方案。但是,由于导致脱碳能源系统的途径不同,因此始终存在着哪个政治和技术解决方案最有效,最有效和最可行的问题。本文旨在分析具有不同结构条件的两个能源转型领先国家的建筑节能政策措施和手段以及相关的技术解决方案:德国和挪威。因此,我们采用一种比较方法,使我们能够提出和评估现行政策。该论文回答了三个研究问题:(1)在德国和挪威,哪些政策普遍存在,以促进住宅建筑节能和脱碳解决方案的部署? (2)这些政策如何应对特定国家/地区针对建筑行业能源转换的障碍,以及(3)它们对实际实施技术和社会解决方案有何影响?这项研究为国际意义上的国家自主贡献基准测试中的建筑物能源效率这一高度相关的主题提供了新的见解,并讨论了在将全球气候治理转变为国家建筑部门方面的一些未解决的权衡取舍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号