首页> 外文期刊>Energy economics >Market failures of Market Coupling and counter-trading in Europe: An illustrative model based discussion
【24h】

Market failures of Market Coupling and counter-trading in Europe: An illustrative model based discussion

机译:欧洲市场耦合和反向交易的市场失灵:基于说明性模型的讨论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The horizontal integration of the energy market and the organization of transmission services remain two open issues in the restructured European electricity sector. The coupling of the French, Belgian and Dutch electricity markets (the trilateral market) in November 2006 was a real success. The extension of the system to Germany in November 2010 also proceeded smoothly and the intent is to continue with the same market architecture. But Market Coupling is based on a zonal system which has often failed in meshed grids. This may cast doubts on what will happen in the future when electricity demand picks up again and wind develops. The nodal system has generally been more successful than zonal architectures but its implementation is not currently foreseen in the EU. This paper analyzes versions of Market Coupling that differ by the organization of counter-trading. While underplayed in current discussions, counter-trading could become a key element of Market Coupling as its geographic coverage expands and wind penetrates. We simplify matters by assuming away strategic behavior between the energy and counter-trading markets and conduct the analysis on a stylized six node example taken from the literature. We simulate Market Coupling for different assumptions of zonal decomposition and coordination of Transmission System Operators (TSOs). We show that these assumptions matter: even in the absence of strategic behavior, Market Coupling can be quite vulnerable to the particular situation on hand; counter-trading can work well or completely fail and it is not clear beforehand what will prevail. Our analysis relies on standard economic notions such as social welfare and Generalized Nash equilibrium, but the use of these notions is probably novel. The nodal organization is the reference first best scenario: different zonal decompositions and degrees of coordination are then studied with respect to this first best solution.
机译:在重组后的欧洲电力部门中,能源市场的水平整合和传输服务的组织仍然是两个未解决的问题。 2006年11月,法国,比利时和荷兰的电力市场(三边市场)联手取得了真正的成功。该系统于2010年11月向德国的扩展也进展顺利,目的是继续使用相同的市场架构。但是市场耦合是基于分区系统的,该分区系统在网格化网格中经常失败。这可能使人们怀疑,当电力需求再次回升并且风力发展时,未来会发生什么。通常,节点系统比区域体系结构更成功,但目前尚未在欧盟预见到其实现。本文分析了市场耦合的版本,这些版本因反交易的组织而异。尽管在当前的讨论中被忽视,但随着交易的地理覆盖范围的扩大和风的渗透,反交易可能成为市场耦合的关键要素。我们通过假设能源市场和反向交易市场之间的战略行为来简化事务,并根据文献中的一个程式化的六节点示例进行分析。我们针对区域分解和传输系统运营商(TSO)协调的不同假设模拟市场耦合。我们证明了这些假设很重要:即使没有战略行为,市场耦合也很容易受到当前特殊情况的影响;反向交易可以很好地工作或完全失败,并且目前尚不清楚会发生什么。我们的分析依赖于标准的经济概念,例如社会福利和广义纳什均衡,但是这些概念的使用可能是新颖的。节点组织是参考的第一个最佳方案:然后针对该第一个最佳解决方案研究不同的区域分解和协调度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号