...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Conversion & Management >Feasibility analysis of co-fired combined-cycles using biomass-derived gas and natural gas
【24h】

Feasibility analysis of co-fired combined-cycles using biomass-derived gas and natural gas

机译:利用生物质衍生的天然气和天然气共同燃烧联合循环的可行性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper reports the feasibility analysis of co-fired combined cycles (biomass-derived gas + natural gas) based on the gasification of sugarcane residues (bagasse and trash). Performance results are based on simulation of co-fired combined cycles. Feasibility analysis is based on estimates of the capital costs and O&M costs for such cycles, taking into account current and middle term costs of BIG-CC technology (both considering scaling and learning effects). A deep reduction of the investments regarding the gasification island and auxiliaries is a key point to make BIG-CC competitive in the electricity market, and the required learning can be reached with co-fired BIG-CC systems. Besides alleviation of technical problems related to gas turbine operation with biomass-derived gas, co-fired BIG-CC units can operate with relative flexibility regarding the fuel mix. The construction of 10-15 short- to medium-size gasification islands would be enough to induce important cost reductions due to learning effects. As long as the investment on the gasification island is reduced, and depending on the price ratio of natural gas and biomass, pure BIG-CC plants could achieve a reasonable level of feasibility regarding other options of electricity production. In the short run there is no advantage for co-fired combined cycles regarding the costs of reduction of carbon dioxide emissions, but in the middle run both co-fired and pure BIG-CC power plants can be a better option than capture and storage of CO_2.
机译:本文报告了基于甘蔗渣(甘蔗渣和垃圾)气化的联合燃烧联合循环(生物质气体+天然气)的可行性分析。性能结果基于共同燃烧联合循环的模拟。可行性分析是基于此类周期的资本成本和O&M成本估算,并考虑了BIG-CC技术的当前成本和中期成本(均考虑规模效应和学习效果)。大幅减少对气化岛和辅助设备的投资是使BIG-CC在电力市场上具有竞争力的关键点,并且可以通过共同燃烧的BIG-CC系统来获得所需的知识。除了缓解与燃气轮机使用生物质衍生气体相关的技术问题外,共燃BIG-CC装置在混合燃料方面可以相对灵活地运行。由于学习效果的原因,建造10-15个中小型气化岛足以引起重要的成本降低。只要减少在气化岛上的投资,并根据天然气和生物质的价格比,纯BIG-CC电厂就其他电力生产方式而言可以达到合理的可行性。在短期内,联合燃烧联合循环在减少二氧化碳排放成本方面没有优势,但是在中期,联合燃烧和纯BIG-CC发电厂比捕获和储存二氧化碳更好。 CO_2。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号