...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Conversion & Management >Engine performance, combustion, and emissions study of biomass to liquid fuel in a compression-ignition engine
【24h】

Engine performance, combustion, and emissions study of biomass to liquid fuel in a compression-ignition engine

机译:压燃式发动机的生物质转化为液体燃料的发动机性能,燃烧和排放研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this work, the effects of diesel, biodiesel and biomass to liquid (BTL) fuels are investigated in a single-cylinder diesel engine at a fixed speed (2000 rpm) and three engine loads corresponding to 0 bar, 1.26 bar and 3.77 bar brake mean effective pressure (BMEP). The engine performance, in-cylinder combustion, and exhaust emissions were measured. Results show an increase in indicated work for BU and biodiesel at 1.26 bar and 3.77 bar BMEP when compared to diesel but a decrease at 0 bar. Lower mechanical efficiency was observed for BTL and biodiesel at 1.26 bar BMEP but all three fuels had roughly the same mechanical efficiency at 3.77 bar BMEP. BTL was found to have the lowest brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) and the highest brake thermal efficiency (BTE) among the three fuels tested. Combustion profiles for the three fuels were observed to vary depending on the engine load. Biodiesel was seen to have the shortest ignition delay among the three fuels regardless of engine loads. Diesel had the longest ignition delay at 0 bar and 3.77 bar BMEP but had the same ignition delay as BTL at 1.26 bar BMEP. At 1.26 bar and 3.77 bar BMEP, BTL had the lowest HC emissions but highest HC emissions at no load conditions when compared to biodiesel and diesel. When compared to diesel and biodiesel BTL had lower CO and CO2 emissions. At 0 bar and 1.26 bar BMEP, BTL had higher NOx emissions than diesel fuel but lower NOx than biodiesel at no load conditions. At the highest engine load tested, NOx emissions were observed to be highest for diesel fuel but lowest for BTL. At 1.26 bar BMEP, diesel had a higher smoke opacity than BTL and biodiesel. At 3.77 bar BMEP, BTL had the highest smoke opacity with diesel fuel having the lowest opacity. This work also demonstrated the effectiveness of BTL as a renewable alternative fuel with characteristics comparable to regular diesel fuel. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在这项工作中,研究了单缸柴油发动机在固定速度(2000 rpm)和三种发动机负荷(分别为0 bar,1.26 bar和3.77 bar制动)下对柴油,生物柴油和生物质对液体(BTL)燃料的影响。平均有效压力(BMEP)。测量了发动机性能,缸内燃烧和废气排放。结果表明,与柴油相比,BUEP和生物柴油的指示功在1.26 bar和BMEP 3.77 bar时有所增加,但在0 bar时有所降低。对于BTL和生物柴油,在1.26 bar BMEP下观察到较低的机械效率,但所有三种燃料在3.77 bar BMEP下具有大致相同的机械效率。发现BTL在三种测试燃料中具有最低的制动比油耗(BSFC)和最高的制动热效率(BTE)。观察到三种燃料的燃烧曲线根据发动机负载而变化。不论发动机负载如何,生物柴油在三种燃料中点火延迟最短。柴油在0 bar和3.77 bar BMEP下具有最长的点火延迟,但在BEP 1.26 bar BMEP下具有与BTL相同的点火延迟。与生物柴油和柴油相比,BTL在BMEP为1.26 bar和3.77 bar时,HC排放量最低,但空载条件下的HC排放量最高。与柴油和生物柴油相比,BTL的CO和CO2排放量更低。在0巴和1.26巴的BMEP下,在空载条件下,BTL的NOx排放量高于柴油,但低于生物柴油的NOx排放。在测试的最高发动机负载下,观察到柴油的NOx排放最高,而BTL的最低。在BMEP为1.26 bar时,柴油比BTL和生物柴油具有更高的烟度。在3.77巴的BMEP下,BTL的烟气不透明度最高,而柴油的不透明度最低。这项工作还证明了BTL作为可再生替代燃料的有效性,其特性可与常规柴油相比。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号