首页> 外文期刊>Energy Conversion & Management >Installation of fuel cell-based cogeneration systems in the commercial and retail sector: Assessment in the framework of the COMSOS project
【24h】

Installation of fuel cell-based cogeneration systems in the commercial and retail sector: Assessment in the framework of the COMSOS project

机译:在商业和零售业的燃料电池的热电联产系统安装:COMSOS项目框架中的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This work studies the technical and economic feasibility of the introduction of a SOFC-based cogeneration system to supply non-residential buildings with electricity and heat. The techno-economic evaluation is performed for the hotel and hospital sectors, by introducing real hourly load profiles (electrical and thermal) for the buildings. The analysis considers different countries in terms of energy intensity (and load profiles), cost of energy and regulations/incentives. Results are achieved by comparing the SOFC scenario with a benchmark one where electricity is supplied by the grid and heat by a natural gas fed boiler and evaluating the relative payback time between the two solutions.The analysis showed that, despite the current high investment cost of the SOFC system, in countries such as Germany, Italy and UK (where electricity prices are among the highest in Europe), the option is yet advisable if supported by effective subsidies (already existing for cogeneration systems), and it could offer a competitive alternative to traditional systems, especially in the hospital sector, where the relative payback time is achieved in the 10th year for UK, and in the 14th year for Germany and Italy. A cost reduction scenario has also been analyzed: results show that the SOFC is the best option in most of the locations, both economically and in terms of environmental impact (pollutants emissions reduction).
机译:这项工作研究了引入基于SOFC的热电联产系统的技术和经济可行性,以提供具有电力和热量的非住宅建筑。通过为建筑物引入真正的每小时负载型材(电气和热),为酒店和医院部门进行了技术经济评估。分析考虑了不同国家的能源强度(和负载型材),能源和法规/奖励的成本。通过将SOFC场景与基准1进行比较来实现的结果,其中电网通过馈电锅炉提供电网和热量的热量,并评估两种解决方案之间的相对投资回收时间。分析表明,尽管目前的高投资成本在德国,意大利和英国等国家(欧洲最高的国家)中的SOFC系统,如果有效补贴(已经存在于热电系统)的支持,则尚可建议,并且可以提供竞争的替代方案传统系统,特别是在医院部门,相对投资回收期在英国第10年实现,并在德国和意大利的第14年实现。还分析了降低成本场景:结果表明,SOFC是大多数地点的最佳选择,两者在经济上以及环境影响(污染物排放减少)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号