首页> 外文期刊>Energy and Buildings >Energy, cost, and CO_2 emission comparison between radiant wall panel systems and radiator systems
【24h】

Energy, cost, and CO_2 emission comparison between radiant wall panel systems and radiator systems

机译:辐射墙板系统和散热器系统之间的能源,成本和CO_2排放比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The main goal of this paper is to evaluate the possibility of application or replacement of radiators with low-temperature radiant panels. This paper shows the comparison results of operations of 4 space heating systems: the low-temperature radiant panel system without any additional thermal insulation of external walls (PH-WOI), the low-temperature radiant panel system with additional thermal insulation of external walls (PH-WI), the radiator system without any additional thermal insulation of external walls (the classical heating system) (RH-WOI), and the radiator system with additional thermal insulation of external walls (RH-WI). The operation of each system is simulated by software EnergyPlus. The investigation shows that the PH-WI gives the best results. The RH-WOI has the largest energy consumption, and the largest pollutant emission. However, the PH-WI requires the highest investment.
机译:本文的主要目的是评估用低温辐射板应用或更换散热器的可能性。本文显示了四种空间供暖系统运行的比较结果:没有外墙额外隔热的低温辐射板系统(PH-WOI),有外墙额外隔热的低温辐射板系统( PH-WI),没有外墙额外隔热的散热器系统(传统的加热系统)(RH-WOI)和具有外墙额外隔热的散热器系统(RH-WI)。每个系统的运行都通过EnergyPlus软件进行模拟。调查表明,PH-WI效果最佳。 RH-WOI具有最大的能耗和最大的污染物排放量。但是,PH-WI需要最高的投资。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号