...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy and Buildings >EnergyPlus vs D0E-2.1e: The effect of ground coupling on cooling/heating energy requirements of slab-on-grade code houses in four climates of the US
【24h】

EnergyPlus vs D0E-2.1e: The effect of ground coupling on cooling/heating energy requirements of slab-on-grade code houses in four climates of the US

机译:EnergyPlus vs D0E-2.1e:在美国的四种气候下,地面耦合对平板级规范房屋的冷却/加热能量需求的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A transition is occurring from DOE-2 to EnergyPlus in verification of residential energy code compliance, which increased the interest in the differences between these simulation tools. This study quantifies the differences between the slab-on-grade heat transfer models of DOE-2 (Winkelmann model, GCW) and EnergyPlus (the Slab model, GCS) programs for low rise energy code compliant residential buildings in hot-humid, hot-dry, temperate and cold climates of the U.S. The reliabilities of these models were also discussed by comparing them with the more detailed TRNSYS slab-on-grade model (CCT). The findings showed that, GCWcalculated 10-13% higher total building loads than GCTdid for identical slab-on-grade houses. GCS showed unconverged zone air temperatures and limitations for certain insulation configurations which resulted in 18-32% lower thermal loads than those calculated by GCT. When the zone air temperatures were converged, however, GCS calculated building loads within 9% of those calculated by GCT. This indicated a necessity of improvement in GCS to avoid erroneous results in residential energy code compliance calculations.
机译:在验证住宅能源法规符合性方面,正在从DOE-2过渡到EnergyPlus,这引起了人们对这些仿真工具之间差异的兴趣。这项研究量化了DOE-2平板级传热模型(Winkelmann模型,GCW)和EnergyPlus(Slab模型,GCS)程序之间的差异,该程序适用于湿热,美国的干旱,温带和寒冷气候。还通过将它们与更详细的TRNSYS平板级模型(CCT)进行比较,讨论了这些模型的可靠性。研究结果表明,对于相同的平板房屋,GCW计算出的总建筑荷载比GCTdid高出10-13%。 GCS显示出未收敛的区域空气温度以及某些绝缘配置的局限性,这导致比GCT计算的热负荷低18-32%。但是,当区域内的空气温度收敛时,GCS计算出的建筑负荷在GCT计算出的建筑负荷的9%之内。这表明有必要改进GCS,以避免在住宅能源法规合规性计算中得出错误的结果。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy and Buildings》 |2012年第9期|p.189-206|共18页
  • 作者单位

    College of Architecture. Texas A&M University, 053 WERC. 3137 TAMU. College Station. TX 77843-3137, USA;

    College of Architecture. Texas A&M University, 053 WERC. 3137 TAMU. College Station. TX 77843-3137, USA;

    College of Architecture. Texas A&M University, 053 WERC. 3137 TAMU. College Station. TX 77843-3137, USA;

    CARD Analytics Inc., 1028 Busse Highway, Park Ridge, IL 60068. USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    BESTEST; energyplus; DOE-2; TRNSYS; ground coupling; slab-on-grade;

    机译:最好的energyplus;DOE-2;TRNSYS;接地耦合板坯;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号