首页> 外文期刊>Energy and Buildings >Residential energy consumption patterns and the overall housing energy requirements of urban and rural households in Finland
【24h】

Residential energy consumption patterns and the overall housing energy requirements of urban and rural households in Finland

机译:芬兰城市和农村家庭的住宅能耗模式和总体住房能源需求

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this study, we analyze holistically the residential energy consumption patterns and the overall housing energy requirements of urban and rural households in Finland. We study separately three of the most common types of housing-apartment buildings, row-/terraced houses, and detached houses-and include private and the communal building energy as well as the amount of energy consumed by free-time residences. With this study, we add perspective to the ongoing discussion on the sustainability of urban versus rural living and that of different housing types. We employ Household Budget Survey data from Statistics Finland and data from the Finnish Forest Research Institute (Metla) to extract the actual energy purchases and convert them into energy units. Our key findings include five perspectives: (1) behavioral differences seem significant between different housing modes; (2) each housing mode appears to be less energy-intensive in rural areas; (3) including indirect energy purchases is essential when comparing different housing modes; (4) unit-of-analysis (m~2, capita, household) selection strongly affects the results; and (5) the energy mixes vary significantly between the studied building types, changing from the predominance of non-renewables in apartment buildings to that of renewables in detached houses, which in turn has interesting carbon footprint implications.
机译:在这项研究中,我们从整体上分析了芬兰城市和农村家庭的住宅能耗模式和总体住房能源需求。我们分别研究了三种最常见的住房类型:公寓建筑,联排/联排别墅和独立式住宅,其中包括私人和公共建筑的能源以及闲暇时间所消耗的能源数量。通过这项研究,我们为正在进行的有关城市与农村生活以及不同住房类型的可持续性的讨论增加了视角。我们使用了来自芬兰统计局的家庭预算调查数据和芬兰森林研究所(Metla)的数据,以提取实际的能源购买并将其转换为能源单位。我们的主要发现包括五个方面:(1)不同住房模式之间的行为差​​异似乎很明显; (2)在农村地区,每种住房模式似乎能耗较低; (3)在比较不同的住房模式时,必须包括间接购买能源; (4)分析单位(m〜2,人均,住户)的选择会严重影响结果; (5)所研究的建筑类型之间的能量混合差异很大,从公寓建筑中不可再生能源的优势变为独立式住宅中可再生能源的优势,这反过来又对碳足迹产生了有趣的影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy and Buildings》 |2014年第6期|295-303|共9页
  • 作者

    Jukka Heinonen; Seppo Junnila;

  • 作者单位

    Aalto University, Department of Real Estate, Planning and Geoinformacics, P.O. Box 15800, Vaisalantie 8,00076 Aalto,Finland;

    Aalto University, Department of Real Estate, Planning and Geoinformacics, P.O. Box 15800, Vaisalantie 8,00076 Aalto,Finland;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Urban; Rural; Residential energy; Household; Building type; Lifestyle;

    机译:城市乡村;住宅能源;家庭;建筑类型;生活方式;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号