首页> 外文期刊>Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews >Changing of energy consumption patterns from rural households to urban households in China: An example from Shaanxi Province, China
【24h】

Changing of energy consumption patterns from rural households to urban households in China: An example from Shaanxi Province, China

机译:中国从农村家庭到城市家庭的能源消费方式变化:以中国陕西省为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We chose five study sites, from a traditional village, the Laoxiancheng Village, in remote mountainous areas to towns, the Houzhenzi Xiang Township, the Mazhao Town and the Zhouzhi County Town, as well as in a modern city, Xi'an in the Shaanxi Province of China, to study differences in energy consumption between rural and urban households and to assess its conservation implications. This study confirmed the prediction of the 'ladder of fuel preferences' theory. Energies used in urban households are more convenient, cleaner, and more efficient than those used in rural areas, where biomass and coal are common fuel. The amount of energy used for entertainment and electric appliances is greater in urban areas, whereas the quantity used for cooking is larger in rural districts. People in Laoxiancheng Village completely depended on fuelwood for cooking and heating. In the Houzhenzi Xiang Township, 16.7% household use coal ball, and 23.3% use LPG. Electricity and fuelwood were used in each household. In the Mazhao Town, 96.7% households used crop residue, 90% used coal, about 30% use LPG, and every household used electricity. In the Zhouzhi County Town, of the entire sampled household, 92.7% used coal, 92.7% of household used LPG and 37.5% household used gasoline. In the Xi'an city, of the entire sampled household, 32.8% household used natural gas, 67.2% used LPG; about 34.9% household used gasoline, 48.6% household used electricity and 51.4% used natural gas for heating in winter. In the five study areas, the ratio of each energy source consumed per household was also different. In the Houzhenzi Xiang Township, coal took 6.2%, LPG 1.4%, electricity 1.4% and fuelwood 91%. In the Mazhao Town, crop residue took 31.4%, coal 62.2%, LPG 2.2%, and electricity 4.2%. In the Zhouzhi County Town, the importance
机译:我们选择了五个研究地点,从偏远山区的传统村庄老先城村到城镇,后镇子乡,马钊镇和周至县城,以及现代城市陕西省西安市。中国省,研究农村和城市家庭之间的能源消耗差异并评估其节能意义。这项研究证实了对“燃料偏好阶梯”理论的预测。与农村地区使用的能源相比,农村地区使用的能源更方便,更清洁,更高效,在农村地区,生物质和煤炭是常见的燃料。在城市地区,用于娱乐和电器的能源量较大,而在农村地区,用于烹饪的能源量较大。老县城村的人们完全依靠薪柴做饭和取暖。在后镇子乡乡,家用煤球占16.7%,液化石油气占23.3%。每个家庭都使用电力和薪柴。在马钊镇,有96.7%的家庭用农作物残渣,90%的家庭用煤,约30%的家庭用LPG,每个家庭都用电。在周至县城,整个抽样家庭中,有92.7%的用煤,92.7%的家庭用LPG和37.5%的家庭用汽油。在西安市,整个抽样家庭中,天然气使用家庭占32.8%,液化石油气占67.2%。冬季约有34.9%的家庭用汽油,48.6%的家庭用电和51.4%的天然气用于取暖。在五个研究区域中,每个家庭消耗的每种能源的比例也不同。在后镇子乡,煤炭占6.2%,液化石油气占1.4%,电力占1.4%,薪柴占91%。在马照镇,农作物残渣占31.4%,煤炭占62.2%,液化石油气占2.2%,电力占4.2%。在周至县城,重要性

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号