首页> 外文期刊>Energy and Buildings >A comparative study on the effect of different strategies for energy saving of air-cooled vapor compression air conditioning systems
【24h】

A comparative study on the effect of different strategies for energy saving of air-cooled vapor compression air conditioning systems

机译:风冷蒸汽压缩空调系统不同节能策略效果的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper investigates and compares the energy saving potential of air-cooled vapor compression air conditioning systems by using liquid pressure amplification (LPA), evaporative-cooled condenser (ECC) and combined LPA and ECC strategies. The applicability, limitation and energy performance of these strategies are discussed. For the purpose of this study, an existing direct expansion rooftop package of a commercial building is used for experimentation and data collection. The system under investigation is extensively equipped with a number of instrumentation devices for data logging. Theoretical-empirical mathematical models for system components were developed first, while a numerical algorithm together with monitored data and a mathematical model implemented on a transient system simulation tool is used to predict the performance of each strategy under transient loads. The integrated simulation tool was validated by comparing predicted and measured power consumption of the rooftop package. Comparing between LPA and ECC methods shows that for the ambient temperatures less than 27 ℃ the LPA is more effective method while for ambient temperature greater than 27 ℃the ECC system is more efficient. Our results also demonstrate average energy savings of 25.3%, 18.3% and 44.2%, respectively for LPA, ECC and combined LPA and ECC methods.
机译:本文研究并比较了通过使用液体压力放大(LPA),蒸发冷却冷凝器(ECC)以及LPA和ECC组合策略的空冷蒸汽压缩空调系统的节能潜力。讨论了这些策略的适用性,局限性和能源性能。出于本研究的目的,将商业建筑物的现有直接扩展屋顶套件用于实验和数据收集。被调查的系统广泛配备了许多用于数据记录的仪器设备。首先开发了用于系统组件的理论-经验数学模型,而数值算法与监控数据以及在瞬态系统仿真工具上实现的数学模型一起用于预测每种策略在瞬态负载下的性能。通过比较屋顶套件的预测功耗和实测功耗,验证了集成仿真工具的有效性。 LPA和ECC方法的比较表明,对于环境温度低于27℃的情况,LPA是更有效的方法,而对于环境温度高于27℃的情况,ECC系统更有效。我们的结果还表明,LPA,ECC以及LPA和ECC组合方法的平均节能量分别为25.3%,18.3%和44.2%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号