...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy and Buildings >Life cycle energy balance of residential buildings: A case study on hypothetical building models in Finland
【24h】

Life cycle energy balance of residential buildings: A case study on hypothetical building models in Finland

机译:住宅建筑的生命周期能量平衡:以芬兰的假设建筑模型为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study has demonstrated the life cycle primary energy balance of the four residential building types (detached house, row house, townhouse and apartment block) based on current Finnish design. The differences in the energy balance arising from the geometrical characteristics of each housing type were investigated using hypothetical building models. In addition, the influence of structural frame material selection was observed in relation to the housing types. The results showed that there are clear differences between the housing types: the detached house is the highest energy consumer, the row house the second (about 20% less), the townhouse the third (about 30% less) and the apartment block the lowest (about 45% less), regardless of the frame materials selection. The differences appeared evenly among the building life cycle stages. A correlation has been observed between the geometrical factors and life cycle primary energy balance of the reference buildings. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究表明,根据当前的芬兰设计,四种住宅建筑类型(独立式住宅,联排别墅,联排别墅和公寓楼)的生命周期一次能源平衡。使用假设的建筑模型研究了每种房屋类型的几何特征所产生的能量平衡差异。此外,还观察到了结构框架材料选择相对于外壳类型的影响。结果表明,房屋类型之间存在明显差异:独立屋是能源消耗最高的,排屋第二(减少约20%),排屋是第三(减少约30%),而公寓区最低(减少约45%),而不考虑框架材料的选择。这些差异在建筑生命周期各阶段之间平均出现。已经观察到参考建筑物的几何因素与生命周期的一次能源平衡之间存在相关性。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号