...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy and Buildings >Genetic algorithm optimized impact assessment of optimally placed DGs and FACTS controller with different load models from minimum total real power loss viewpoint
【24h】

Genetic algorithm optimized impact assessment of optimally placed DGs and FACTS controller with different load models from minimum total real power loss viewpoint

机译:从最小总有功损耗的角度看,遗传算法优化了具有不同负载模型的最优DG和FACTS控制器的影响评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper presents the impact assessment of optimally placed different distributed generations (DGs) with different load models (DLMs) (such as DG-1, DG-2, DG-3 and DG-4) and flexible alternating current transmission system (FACTS) controller like static VAR compensator (SVC) by employing genetic algorithm (GA) in a distribution power systems (DPSs) from minimum total real power loss viewpoint. Different DPS performance indices such as minimization of real power loss, minimization of the reactive power loss, improvement of the voltage profile, reduction of the short circuit current or MVA line capacity and reduction of the environmental greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide (CO2), sulphur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxide (NOx) and particulate matters in an emergency e.g. under fault, sudden change in field excitation of alternators or load increase in DPSs are considered. A comparison among different DGs with DLMs (such as DG-1, DG-2, DG-3 and DG-4) and FACTS controller like SVC is presented in this paper by employing GA. The effectiveness of the proposed methodology is tested on IEEE 37-bus distribution test system (38-node system). This paper clarifies the fact that, among the four types of DGs considered, DG-2 and DG-4 types of DGs at different operating power factors and FACTS controller like SVC offer better DPS performance indices when power factors varies from 0.80 to 0.99 leading and lagging, respectively. It is revealed that DG-2 type DG and SVC gives better DPS performance indices as compared to DG-1, DG-3 and DG-4 types DGs with DLMs and SVC. It is observed that DG-2 with SVC is more reliable and efficient as compared to the rest types of DG like DG-1, DG-3and DG-4 with SVC. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:本文介绍了具有不同负载模型(DLM)(例如DG-1,DG-2,DG-3和DG-4)和灵活的交流输电系统(FACTS)的最优放置的不同分布式发电(DG)的影响评估从最小总有功损耗的角度出发,通过在配电系统(DPS)中采用遗传算法(GA),采用静态VAR补偿器(SVC)之类的控制器。不同的DPS性能指标,例如最小化实际功率损耗,最小化无功功率损耗,改善电压曲线,减少短路电流或MVA线路容量以及减少环境温室气体,例如二氧化碳(CO2),硫磺紧急情况下的二氧化碳(SO2),氮氧化物(NOx)和颗粒物在故障下,应考虑交流发电机励磁的突然变化或DPS的负载增加。本文利用遗传算法对不同的DG与DLM(如DG-1,DG-2,DG-3和DG-4)和FACTS控制器(如SVC)进行了比较。在IEEE 37总线配电测试系统(38节点系统)上测试了所提出方法的有效性。本文阐明了以下事实:在所考虑的四种类型的DG中,不同功率因数下的DG-2和DG-4类型的DG以及SVC之类的FACTS控制器在功率因数从0.80到0.99的变化范围内时,可以提供更好的DPS性能指标。滞后。结果表明,与带有DLM和SVC的DG-1,DG-3和DG-4型DG相比,DG-2型DG和SVC具有更好的DPS性能指标。可以看出,与其他类型的DG(如带有SVC的DG-1,DG-3和DG-4)相比,带有SVC的DG-2更加可靠和高效。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号