...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy and Buildings >How do electricity pricing programs impact the selection of energy efficiency measures? - A case study with U.S. Medium office buildings
【24h】

How do electricity pricing programs impact the selection of energy efficiency measures? - A case study with U.S. Medium office buildings

机译:电力定价计划如何影响能源效率措施的选择? - 用美国中型建筑为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Building owners usually select energy efficiency measures (EEMs) by referring to return on investment (ROI). Current studies tend to apply static energy price to estimate ROI. However, more and more buildings are adopting dynamic electricity pricing programs. To understand how electricity pricing programs impact the selection of EEMs, this paper presents an analysis of the ROIs of EEMs under different pricing programs using U.S. medium office buildings as an example. Eight EEMs in four typical cities are selected as case studies. Considering five electricity pricing programs scenarios (one static program and four dynamic programs), EEMs are selected based on their ROIs. The main findings are: (1) The ROIs of EEMs change under different pricing programs. (2) In Honolulu, Buffalo, and Denver, replacing interior fixtures with higher-efficiency fixtures has a significantly higher ROI than the rest EEMs under all five pricing programs. However, the ROI of this EEM in Honolulu ranges from 28% to 47% for different pricing programs. (3) Similarly, in Fairbanks, replace heating coil with higher-efficiency coil produce higher ROI than the rest under all five pricing programs. (4) For other EEMs, their ROI rankings vary according to electricity pricing programs. (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:建筑业主通常通过参考投资回报(ROI)选择能效措施(EEMS)。目前的研究倾向于施加静态能源价格来估算投资回报率。然而,越来越多的建筑正在采用动态电力定价计划。要了解电定价计划如何影响EEM的选择,本文以美国中型建筑物为例,对不同定价计划下的EEM乐可以分析。四个典型城市中的八个EEM被选为案例研究。考虑五个电力定价计划场景(一个静态程序和四个动态程序),基于其ROI选择EEM。主要研究结果是:(1)EEMS在不同定价方案下改变的ROI。 (2)在檀香山,布法罗和丹佛,用更高效率的夹具更换内部夹具的ROI明显高于所有五个定价计划下的REMS。然而,檀香山的这一EEM的投资回报率从28%到47%的不同定价计划。 (3)同样,在Fairbanks中,用更高效率的线圈取代加热线圈,而不是所有五个定价计划的剩余卷。 (4)对于其他EEMS,他们的投资回报率排名根据电力定价计划而变化。 (c)2020 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy and Buildings》 |2020年第10期|110267.1-110267.12|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Colorado Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn Boulder CO 80309 USA;

    Univ Colorado Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn Boulder CO 80309 USA;

    Univ Colorado Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn Boulder CO 80309 USA|Natl Renewable Energy Lab Golden CO 80401 USA;

    Pacific Northwest Natl Lab Richland WA 99354 USA;

    Univ Miami Civil Architectural & Environm Engn Dept Coral Gables FL 33146 USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Electricity price; Energy efficiency measure; Retrofit; Modeling and simulation; Demand response;

    机译:电价;能效测量;改造;建模与仿真;需求响应;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号