...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy and Buildings >Assessment of data analysis methods to identify the heat loss coefficient from on-board monitoring data
【24h】

Assessment of data analysis methods to identify the heat loss coefficient from on-board monitoring data

机译:评估数据分析方法以识别从板载监测数据的热损失系数

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The past decade has seen the rapid development of sensor technologies. Monitoring data of the interior climate and energy consumption of in-use buildings, so-called on-board monitoring (OBM) data, offers the opportunity to identify as-built energy performance indicators, such as the heat loss coefficient (HLC) of the building envelope. To this end, it is important to advance the understanding of the impact of the OBM set-up and the applied data analysis method.This paper uses synthetic OBM data sets, generated from building energy simulations. The level of accuracy achieved with four data analysis methods for characterizing the HLC is investigated. The considered methods are the Average Method, the Energy Signature Method, Linear Regression and ARX modeling. Different cases, representing different building types, are considered in order to gain thorough insight into the physical interpretation of the results. By taking subsets of the original data sets, the sensitivity of the data analysis methods to the availability of specific data is assessed.This theoretical exercise illustrates how, under idealized monitoring circumstances, both linear regression and ARX models can accurately determine the HLC. The latter is able to assess the performance indicator within 5%. However, when subjected to practical limitations regarding the measurement of system inputs, such as unavailable solar or internal heat gains, the characterization results show large variations in accuracy and uncertainty. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:过去十年已经看到传感器技术的快速发展。监控内部气候和能源消耗的内部气候和能源消耗,所谓的车载监测(OBM)数据,提供了识别竣工能源性能指标的机会,例如热损耗系数(HLC)建筑围护结构。为此,重要的是要提高对OBM设置的影响和应用数据分析方法的影响。本文使用从构建能量模拟中产生的合成OBM数据集。研究了用于表征HLC的四种数据分析方法所达到的精度水平。所考虑的方法是平均方法,能量签名方法,线性回归和ARX建模。考虑不同的建筑物类型的不同案例被认为是为了充分了解对结果的物理解释。通过采用原始数据集的子集,评估数据分析方法对特定数据可用性的灵敏度。本理论练习说明了如何在理想化监控情况下,线性回归和ARX模型可以准确地确定HLC。后者能够在5%以内评估绩效指标。然而,当对系统输入的测量的实际限制进行实际限制时,例如不可用的太阳能或内部热量增益,表征结果表明精度和不确定性的大变化。 (c)2019 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号