首页> 外文期刊>Energy and Buildings >Politics, problematisation, and policy: A comparative analysis of energy poverty in England, Ireland and France
【24h】

Politics, problematisation, and policy: A comparative analysis of energy poverty in England, Ireland and France

机译:政治,问题和政策:英格兰,爱尔兰和法国能源贫困的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Energy poverty, as a social and political issue, is at different stages of development across Europe. Originating in the UK, it is reaching the political agenda in other European countries, driven by a range of concurrent issues including: economic recession and inequality, low carbon energy transitions, and changing consumption demands. This article presents analysis of three national approaches to energy poverty in Europe; England, Ireland and France. In comparing these cases, we show how each defines and measures energy poverty differently and how this affects the selection and functioning of different policy solutions. We draw on the conceptual separation of multiple streams theory (politics, problems and policy) to assess the shape of energy poverty on the political agenda of each nation. We consider the political context of each nation and show how energy poverty overlaps with other agendas such as: welfare reform, energy market liberalisation and climate change. We review each country's approach to defining the problem of energy poverty focusing on how the issue is delineated and measured. In each case, we show how there has been recourse to two broad types of policy solution: subsidising energy costs and improving the efficiency of the housing stock. Our analysis reveals interesting similarities (e.g. in the use of affordability and efficiency policies) and differences (e.g. in the versatility of definitions) in addressing the significant levels of inequality in access to energy services among the populations of three Western European countries. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:作为社会和政治问题的能源贫困是在欧洲的不同发展阶段。在英国起源,它正在达到其他欧洲国家的政治议程,这是一系列并发问题的驱动,包括:经济衰退和不平等,低碳能源转型,以及不断变化的消费需求。本文提出了欧洲能源贫困三种国家的分析;英格兰,爱尔兰和法国。在比较这些案例时,我们展示了如何定义和测量能源贫困的不同以及如何影响不同政策解决方案的选择和运作。我们利用多流理论(政治,问题和政策)的概念分离,以评估能源贫困的形状对每个国家的政治议程。我们认为每个国家的政治背景,并展示能源贫困如何与其他议程重叠,例如:福利改革,能源市场自由化和气候变化。我们审查每个国家的方法来定义能源贫困问题,重点是如何划定和衡量问题。在每种情况下,我们展示了如何求助于两种广泛的政策解决方案:补贴能源成本并提高住房股票的效率。我们的分析揭示了有趣的相似之处(例如,在使用可负担性和效率政策时)和差异(例如,在定义的多功能性中),以解决三个西欧国家人口中获取能源服务的大量不平等程度。 (c)2019 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号