首页> 外文期刊>Energy and Buildings >Analysis and comparison of two vegetative roof heat and mass transfer models in three different climates
【24h】

Analysis and comparison of two vegetative roof heat and mass transfer models in three different climates

机译:三种不同气候下两种植物屋顶传热传质模型的分析和比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study analyzed and compared in detail two existing heat and mass transfer models for vegetative roofs, which were developed by Sailor (2008) and Tabares-Velasco and Srebric (2012). The main equations governing the heat transfer through a vegetative roof were compared side by side. Similarities and differences were highlighted. Both models were programmed in MATLAB, and thermal capacitance of the substrate was implemented by using the finite difference method. The accuracy of both models was evaluated by comparing their results with experimental data obtained on six extensive vegetative roofs, located in three different climate zones, during different seasons of the year. Overall, results showed that both models provide similar predictions of the substrate temperatures. Furthermore, these are in close agreement with the experimental data: for five out of six investigated vegetative roofs, the root mean square deviation is limited to the range of 1.2 degrees C to 2.5 degrees C for the Sailor model and of 0.6 degrees C to 3.0 degrees C for the Tabares-Velasco and Srebric model. Despite the close agreement between both models, the study also revealed that they greatly differ in the way they evaluate the latent (evaporation) and sensible (convective) heat fluxes, suggesting that at least one of them is miscalculating these heat fluxes. Further research on this topic is recommended. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究详细分析和比较了Salor(2008)以及Tabares-Velasco和Srebric(2012)开发的两个现有的植物屋顶传热传质模型。并排比较了控制通过植物屋顶传热的主要方程式。强调了异同。两种模型均在MATLAB中编程,并且使用有限差分法实现了基板的热容。通过将它们的结果与一年中不同季节在三个不同气候区的六个大型植被屋顶上获得的实验数据进行比较,来评估这两个模型的准确性。总体而言,结果表明两个模型都提供了相似的基板温度预测。此外,这些与实验数据非常吻合:对于六个调查过的植物屋顶中的五个,Sailor模型的均方根偏差限制为1.2摄氏度至2.5摄氏度,0.6摄氏度至3.0摄氏度Tabares-Velasco和Srebric模型的摄氏度。尽管这两个模型之间有着密切的一致性,但研究还表明,它们在评估潜热(蒸发)和显热(对流)热通量的方式上有很大不同,这表明它们中至少有一个正在错误地计算这些热通量。建议对此主题进行进一步研究。 (C)2019 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy and Buildings》 |2019年第11期|109367.1-109367.12|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile Sch Engn Dept Construct Engn & Management Av Vicuna Mackenna 4860 Santiago 7820436 RM Chile|Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile Ctr Sustainable Urban Dev CEDEUS Santiago 7530091 RM Chile|Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile UC Energy Res Ctr Av Vicuna Mackenna 4860 Santiago 7820436 RM Chile;

    Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile Sch Engn Dept Construct Engn & Management Av Vicuna Mackenna 4860 Santiago 7820436 RM Chile|Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile Ctr Sustainable Urban Dev CEDEUS Santiago 7530091 RM Chile;

    Colorado Sch Mines Dept Mech Engn 1500 Illinois St Golden CO 80401 USA;

    Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile Sch Engn Dept Construct Engn & Management Av Vicuna Mackenna 4860 Santiago 7820436 RM Chile;

    Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile Ctr Sustainable Urban Dev CEDEUS Santiago 7530091 RM Chile|Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile UC Energy Res Ctr Av Vicuna Mackenna 4860 Santiago 7820436 RM Chile|Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile Sch Architecture El Comendador 1916 Santiago 7530091 RM Chile;

    Univ Melbourne Fac Sci Sch Ecosyst & Forest Sci 500 Yarra Blvd Richmond Vic 3121 Australia|Univ Melbourne Melbourne Sch Engn Dept Infrastruct Engn Renewable Energy & Energy Efficiency Grp Melbourne Vic 3010 Australia;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号