首页> 外文期刊>Emission Control Science and Technology >A Comprehensive Evaluation of a Gaseous Portable Emissions Measurement System with a Mobile Reference Laboratory
【24h】

A Comprehensive Evaluation of a Gaseous Portable Emissions Measurement System with a Mobile Reference Laboratory

机译:带有移动参考实验室的气体便携式排放测量系统的综合评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In-lab and on-road emission comparisons are made between AVL's M.O.V.E GAS PEMS 493 system and the UCR mobile emissions laboratory (MEL), which served as a Federal Reference Method (FRM) for comparison and validation. These comparisons are made for three different heavy-duty engines with NO_x emission certification levels ranging from 0.27 g/kWh (0.2 g/hph) to 5.4 g/kWh (4.0 g/hph). The brake-specific emissions during the Not-To-Exceed (NTE) engine operating zone are compared between the FRM and portable emission measurement systems (PEMS) to quantify the measurement uncertainty of the new commercial PEMS. Overall, the PEMS shows good correlation to the FRM and demonstrate its ability to measure a wide variety range of emission levels. The PEMS brake-specific NO_x (bsNO_x) measurement is well-behaved with +5 to -10 % relative error over the 1.0 to 7.0-g/kWh range. Further, the relative NO_x error ranged from a +15 to -15 % over the 0.1 to 1-g/kWh range. The relative NO_x error increases sharply below 0.1 g/kWh from 15 % to more than 50 % at 0.02 g/kWh. The relative error below 0.10 g/kWh is high due to the very low NO_x emission rates that approach the detection limit of both the raw PEMS and dilute FRM measurement methods. The PEMS bsCO_2 average bias is observed to be slightly higher than the MEL reference laboratory at 2 % overall. The PEMS NMHC and CO emissions were on average -11.8 and -3.6 % compared to the MEL for the 2006 engine, respectively. The main purpose of this study was to determine the measurement uncertainty of recently released PEMS in comparison with legacy and ultra-low emission modern heavy-duty vehicles.
机译:在AVL的M.O.V.E GAS PEMS 493系统与UCR移动排放实验室(MEL)之间进行了实验室内和道路上的排放比较,后者用作联邦参考方法(FRM)进行比较和验证。这些比较是针对三种不同的重型发动机进行的,NO_x排放认证水平为0.27 g / kWh(0.2 g / hph)至5.4 g / kWh(4.0 g / hph)。在FRM和便携式排放测量系统(PEMS)之间比较了不超过(NTE)发动机运行区域中特定于制动器的排放,以量化新型商用PEMS的测量不确定度。总体而言,PEMS与FRM表现出良好的相关性,并展示了其测量各种排放水平的能力。在1.0至7.0 g / kWh的范围内,PEMS特定于制动器的NO_x(bsNO_x)测量具有+5至-10%的相对误差。此外,在0.1至1-g / kWh范围内,相对NO_x误差在+15至-15%的范围内。相对NO_x误差在0.02 g / kWh时从0.1%降至0.1 g / kWh以下急剧增加到50%以上。低于0.10 g / kWh的相对误差很高,这是因为非常低的NO_x排放速率接近原始PEMS和稀FRM测量方法的检测极限。观察到PEMS bsCO_2的平均偏差略高于MEL参考实验室,总体偏差为2%。与2006年发动机的MEL相比,PEMS的NMHC和CO排放平均分别为-11.8和-3.6%。这项研究的主要目的是确定与传统和超低排放现代重型车辆相比,最近发布的PEMS的测量不确定度。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Emission Control Science and Technology》 |2016年第3期|173-180|共8页
  • 作者单位

    College of Engineering, Center for Environmental Research and Technology (CE-CERT), University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA;

    College of Engineering, Center for Environmental Research and Technology (CE-CERT), University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA;

    College of Engineering, Center for Environmental Research and Technology (CE-CERT), University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA;

    AVL List GmbH, Hans-List-Platz 1, A-8020 Graz, Austria;

    AVL List GmbH, Hans-List-Platz 1, A-8020 Graz, Austria;

    AVL List GmbH, Hans-List-Platz 1, A-8020 Graz, Austria;

    AVL List GmbH, Hans-List-Platz 1, A-8020 Graz, Austria;

    College of Engineering, Center for Environmental Research and Technology (CE-CERT), University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    PEMS; 40CFR1065; Real world emissions;

    机译:PEMS;40CFR1065;现实世界的排放;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号