首页> 外文期刊>Electronic products >That's not 'green,' dammit!
【24h】

That's not 'green,' dammit!

机译:那不是“绿色”,该死!

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

I was recently reading a speech by a senior executive at an e-company who extolled the use of more energy efficient LEDs in cell phones as a way to make them greener, while at the same time allowing them to take on more functionality and thereby increase their attractiveness to consumers. It must have been a low point in my bio-rhythms cycle, because I got hopping mad! It's true that LEDs are a much more energy efficient light source than other alternatives, as several of the articles in this issue make technically obvious. But sticking an LED on a product doesn't make it "green," even if it is more energy efficient. In the case envisioned by the e-exec-utive, any gain in energy efficiency would be taken up by extra functionality, and so there is no net energy savings for the device.
机译:最近,我正在阅读一家电子公司的高级管理人员的演讲,他高谈阔论在手机中使用更节能的LED,以使其更环保,同时又使它们具有更多功能并因此而增加。它们对消费者的吸引力。这一定是我生物节奏周期的低点,因为我发疯了!的确,LED是比其他替代产品更节能的光源,因为本期的几篇文章在技术上都显而易见。但是即使将LED更加节能,将LED粘贴在产品上也不会使其“绿色”。在e-exec-utive设想的情况下,任何能效提高都将被额外的功能占用,因此该设备没有净节能量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号