首页> 外文期刊>Electronic Markets >Continuous Trading in Thin Private Value Markets: The Multiple-quote Double Auction
【24h】

Continuous Trading in Thin Private Value Markets: The Multiple-quote Double Auction

机译:薄弱的私人价值市场中的连续交易:多报价双拍卖

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

What determines which institution is used for trading in a particular market? It is typically assumed that economic agents in private exchange prefer to trade immediately to economize on time-cost, prefer to trade in a single, centralized location to reduce search costs and prefer to trade anonymously for strategic reasons. This is a trio of requirements that are not currently satisfied by a single institution. For example, bilateral exchange, the call auction and the double auction each perform some of these functions but not all of them. In this paper we introduce an exchange institution that can accommodate these requirements. The institution introduced is, compared to existing institutions, particularly suitable for environments where privacy is valued. It has been argued that the recent failure of public electronic exchanges for business-to-business commerce can be explained by their lack of privacy. The claim is that the survival of bilateral contracting in business-to-business commerce is due to its higher levels of privacy compared to centralized exchanges. The institution is tested experimentally in environments where privacy is potentially valuable and compared to the performance of the standard double auction and bilateral exchange.
机译:是什么决定了哪个机构用于特定市场的交易?通常认为,私人交易所中的经济主体更喜欢立即交易以节省时间成本,更喜欢在单个集中位置进行交易以降低搜索成本,并且出于战略原因更愿意匿名交易。这是目前单个机构无法满足的三项要求。例如,双边交换,电话拍卖和双重拍卖各自执行其中一些功能,但不是全部。在本文中,我们介绍了可以满足这些要求的交换机构。与现有机构相比,引入的机构特别适合重视隐私的环境。有人争辩说,最近的公共电子交易在企业对企业之间的失败可以用缺乏隐私来解释。有人声称,企业对企业之间的双边合同之所以能够生存,是因为与集中式交换相比,它具有更高的隐私级别。该机构在隐私具有潜在价值的环境中进行了实验测试,并与标准的两次拍卖和双边交易的表现进行了比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号