...
首页> 外文期刊>Electronic Engineering Times >Is quality too high a peak?
【24h】

Is quality too high a peak?

机译:质量是不是太高了?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Like jumbo shrimp and military intelligence, the term "EDA quality" is an oxymoron for most working engineers. Electronic design automation companies are forever trying to catch up with Moore's Law by writing quality code to address the complex nuances of chip design. But for many tool makers today, the quality summit remains as elusive a goal as Mount Everest's peak once was for climbers. Yet EDA vendors believe that tool quality is steadily improving despite some inherent challenges that make these tools harder to develop than software for most other industries. The big three in design automation―Synopsys, Cadence and Mentor―have quality assurance programs in place to swat the bugs before their customers get an itch, and smaller operations have their eye on quality as well (see story, below).
机译:像巨型虾和军事情报一样,“ EDA质量”一词对大多数在职工程师来说都是矛盾的。电子设计自动化公司一直在努力通过编写质量代码来解决芯片设计的细微差别,从而赶上摩尔定律。但是对于当今的许多工具制造商而言,质量峰会仍然像珠穆朗玛峰的高峰曾经是登山者那样难以捉摸的目标。然而,EDA供应商认为,尽管存在一些固有的挑战,这些工具的质量仍在稳步提高,但这些挑战使这些工具比大多数其他行业的软件更难开发。设计自动化领域的三大巨头-Synopsys,Cadence和Mentor-制定了质量保证计划,以在客户发痒之前扫除错误,而较小的运营商也关注质量(请参见下面的故事)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号