首页> 外文期刊>Electronic commerce research and applications >Online advertisement service pricing and an option contract
【24h】

Online advertisement service pricing and an option contract

机译:在线广告服务定价和期权合约

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

For the Internet advertisement market, we consider a contract problem between advertisers and publishers. Among several ways of pricing online advertisements, the methods based on cost-per-impression (CPM) and cost-per-click (CPC) are the two most popular. The CPC fee is proportional to the click-through rate (CTR), which is uncertain and makes decisions of advertisers and publishers difficult. In this paper, we suggest a hybrid pricing scheme: advertisers pay the minimum of CPM and CPC fees by purchasing an option from publishers. To determine the option price, we consider a Nash bargaining game for negotiation between an advertiser and a publisher and provide the solution. Further, we show that such option contracts will help the advertiser avoid high cost and the publisher generate more revenue. The option contract will also improve the contract feasibility, compared to CPM and CPC.
机译:对于Internet广告市场,我们考虑广告商和发布商之间的合同问题。在几种在线广告定价方法中,基于每次展示费用(CPM)和每次点击费用(CPC)的方法是最受欢迎的两种。 CPC费用与点击率(CTR)成比例,这是不确定的,使广告商和发布商的决策变得困难。在本文中,我们建议采用混合定价方案:广告商通过从发布商那里购买期权来支付最低的CPM和CPC费用。为了确定期权价格,我们考虑了纳什讨价还价博弈,供广告商和发布商之间进行谈判并提供解决方案。此外,我们表明,此类期权合同将帮助广告商避免高额费用,并帮助发布商产生更多收入。与CPM和CPC相比,期权合同还将提高合同的可行性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号