首页> 外文期刊>Electric power systems research >A modified backward and forward sweep method for microgrid load flow analysis under different electric vehicle load mathematical models
【24h】

A modified backward and forward sweep method for microgrid load flow analysis under different electric vehicle load mathematical models

机译:不同电动汽车负荷数学模型下微电网潮流分析的改进的前后扫频方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A power flow analysis under different electric vehicle (EV) load models based on the modified backward and forward sweep method is presented. Voltage-dependent loads (VDLs) were used to analyze the total power loss and load voltage deviation (LVD) under different EV load models and the general load of the electrical power system. The VDL was defined in the backward stage where the voltage ratio was between bus voltages per nominal voltage. The IEEE 33 bus radial distribution system was selected to be the test system. The EV penetration level was defined as 26.88% compared to the base case of constant power (P). The simulation results showed the impact levels from EV load models to the grid based on the traditional method, with impact levels from high to low being for polynomial load (EVI), constant current load (EVIII), and VDL (EVII) models, respectively. In particular, the highest impact for EVI was in scenario 4 (D), where the total active power loss, total reactive power loss, and LVD were 3.45%, 3.47%, and 3.36%, respectively. Therefore, the EV load model was one important factor to select for solving the power flow of the grid. Moreover, the position and size of the EV load could be considered in the optimal condition for reducing the impact to the grid. However, energy management will become a key challenge for supporting the high penetration of EVs in the near future.
机译:提出了一种基于改进的前后扫频方法的不同电动汽车负荷模型下的潮流分析方法。电压相关负载(VDL)用于分析不同EV负载模型和电力系统的一般负载下的总功率损耗和负载电压偏差(LVD)。 VDL是在反向阶段定义的,其中电压比在每个标称电压的总线电压之间。选择了IEEE 33总线径向分配系统作为测试系统。与恒定功率(P)的基本情况相比,EV渗透水平定义为26.88%。仿真结果显示了基于传统方法的从EV负载模型到电网的影响程度,多项式负载(EVI),恒定电流负载(EVIII)和VDL(EVII)模型的影响程度从高到低分别为。特别是,对EVI的最大影响是在方案4(D)中,其中总有功功率损耗,总无功功率损耗和LVD分别为3.45%,3.47%和3.36%。因此,EV负荷模型是选择解决电网潮流的重要因素之一。此外,可以在最佳条件下考虑EV负载的位置和大小,以减少对电网的影响。然而,在不久的将来,能源管理将成为支持电动汽车高普及率的关键挑战。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Electric power systems research》 |2019年第3期|46-54|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Rajamangala Univ Technol Thanyaburi, Dept Elect Engn, Fac Engn, Thanyaburi Dist 12110, Pathum Thani, Thailand;

    Rajamangala Univ Technol Thanyaburi, Dept Elect Engn, Fac Engn, Thanyaburi Dist 12110, Pathum Thani, Thailand;

    Univ Queensland, Power & Energy Res Grp, Sch Elect Engn & Informat Technol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia;

    Ton Duc Thong Univ, Computat Opt Res Grp, Adv Inst Mat Sci, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam|Ton Duc Thong Univ, Fac Sci Appl, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam;

    Ton Duc Thong Univ, Computat Opt Res Grp, Adv Inst Mat Sci, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Electric vehicle; Exponential load; Modified backward-forward sweep method; Power system; Voltage-dependent load; ZIP;

    机译:电动汽车;指数负载;改进的前向后掠法;动力系统;电压相关负载;ZIP;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号