首页> 外文期刊>Educational Theory >THE POLITICS OF OPTING OUT IN THE AGE OF NEOLIBERAL CYNICISM
【24h】

THE POLITICS OF OPTING OUT IN THE AGE OF NEOLIBERAL CYNICISM

机译:新自由主义的愤世嫉俗时代选择的政治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Within the past several years, parents, teachers, students, and community members have vociferously debated the value and importance of opting out of standardized testing. The debate has been sparked by an increasing number of parents, dubbed "opt-out activists," who refuse to have their children participate in federally mandated standards testing. However, an assortment of civil rights organizations and activists have challenged the opt-out movement. Quentin Wheeler-Bell argues that the debate between those in the opt-out movement and the civil rights activists is an example of neoliberal cynicism. While both groups acknowledge (to different degrees) the structural problems inherent to the current testing regime, they both also make educational demands that assume equal educational opportunity is achievable within a capitalist system. In making this assumption that equal educational opportunity is valuable within capitalism, Wheeler-Bell concludes, both sides ultimately reproduce neoliberal cynicism.
机译:在过去的几年内,父母,教师,学生和社区成员都有大声辩论了选择标准测试的价值和重要性。辩论越来越多的父母,被称为“退出活动家”的辩论,拒绝让孩子参与联邦政府标准测试。然而,各种各样的民权组织和活动家挑战了退出运动。 Quentin Wheeler-Bell认为,退出运动和民权活动人士之间的争论是新自由来的愤世嫉俗的一个例子。虽然两个团体承认(以不同的程度)所固有的经常测试制度所固有的结构问题,但它们也使得在资本主义系统中可以实现平等教育机会的教育需求。在造成这种假设的情况下,平等教育机会在资本主义中有价值,惠勒贝尔的结论是,双方最终繁殖了新自由主义的犬儒主义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号