首页> 外文期刊>Educational Studies >Betwixt and Between: Working Through the Aesthetic in Philosophy of Education: George F. Kneller Lecture, Conference of the American Educational Studies Association Savannah, Georgia, October 30, 2008
【24h】

Betwixt and Between: Working Through the Aesthetic in Philosophy of Education: George F. Kneller Lecture, Conference of the American Educational Studies Association Savannah, Georgia, October 30, 2008

机译:在两者之间:在教育哲学中进行审美研究:乔治·克纳勒(George F. Kneller)演讲,美国教育研究协会会议,乔治亚州萨凡纳,2008年10月30日

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

At a time when both philosophy of education and the arts are under threat within education, this article inquires into interdisciplinarity as one way of approaching the disciplines of philosophy of education and aesthetics. The article offers a retrospective autobiographical intellectual history and phenomenology of the author's own learning and scholarship within Higher Education in three main areas—philosophy of literature education, women's studies, and philosophy of music education, areas paralleling the three periods of her academic career. One sub-theme of this narrative about the balancing act of working in literature and music through philosophy of education is the author's ongoing resistance to professionalization or disciplinary academic control—of literature, philosophy, and music—while being a critical student of educational theory and practice in these areas—philosophy, literature and music within philosophy of education—of thus being “betwixt and between.” Two other themes comprising the article's subtext are “praxis” and “embodiment.” The double entendre of the phrase “working through” entails, first, using the arts of literature and music to practise philosophy of education; and secondly, embracing the psychological, ethical, and spiritual introspection that comes with critical engagement of the arts and its discourses. In short, the article aims to reprise some burning philosophical educational questions that have preoccupied its author over the years, questions deemed especially pertinent to the current increasingly diverse membership in the discipline of educational studies.
机译:在教育哲学和艺术都受到教育内部威胁的时候,本文探究跨学科性是研究教育哲学和美学学科的一种方式。这篇文章回顾了作者在高等教育中三个主要领域(文学教育的哲学,女性研究和音乐教育的哲学)中作者自身的学习和奖学金的回顾性自传知识史和现象学,与她的学术生涯的三个时期平行。关于通过教育哲学从事文学和音乐工作的平衡行为的叙述的一个子主题是作者在成为教育理论和科学的批判性学生的同时,对文学,哲学和音乐的专业化或学科控制的持续抵抗。在这些领域中的实践-教育哲学中的哲学,文学和音乐-因此处于“中间和中间”。构成文章副文本的其他两个主题是“实践”和“实施方式”。 “努力”一词的双重体现是:首先,利用文学和音乐艺术来实践教育哲学;其次,要接受与艺术及其话语的批判性交往有关的心理,伦理和精神上的内省。简而言之,本文旨在重新审视多年来困扰其作者的一些紧迫的哲学教育问题,这些问题被认为与当前教育研究领域成员的多样性日益相关。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Educational Studies》 |2010年第3期|291-316|共26页
  • 作者

    Deanne Bogdan;

  • 作者单位

    Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto,;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:55:00

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号