首页> 外文期刊>Educational Review >Chinese American post-secondary achievement and attainment: a cultural and structural analysis
【24h】

Chinese American post-secondary achievement and attainment: a cultural and structural analysis

机译:华裔美国人的专上成就和成就:文化和结构分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this article, the authors compare Chinese American post-secondary educational attainment with that of White Americans and, in identifying those factors that most strongly account for success, argue that commonalities exist among social structural factors, while distinct differences are evident among cultural capital factors. The article rejects the notion of minority assimilation as the source of success and suggests that Chinese and White cultures, in promoting education, are harmonistic but different. Among the most commonly touted elements of the Model Minority analogy is high academic achievement among Asian Americans. The assertion of high achievement among Asian Americans is not without severe critics, particularly when asserted across the board for all subgroups among Asian Americans. However, when we isolate groups, such as Chinese Americans, or even further isolate immigrant generations, we find clear evidence of academic achievement at least on par with, and in some cases surpassing, achievement among White Americans. In looking specifically at Chinese Americans, several types of explanations can be found in the literature. The two broadest types focus either on structural or cultural factors thought to contribute to achievement. By its very nature, the cultural explanation must identify beneficial elements of one culture as compared to less-beneficial or even detrimental elements of another culture. The structural explanation places its focus on conditions seen to constrain behavior and limit opportunity. This study is a first step in trying to draft a methodology that will allow for further quantitative analysis of cultural factors and will eventually lead to a comprehensive analysis of the strength and direction of the relationships between structural and cultural variables and academic achievement and attainment among Asian Americans. Using secondary analysis of the National Educational Longitudinal Survey: 1988-2000 data set, the authors identify variables and groups of variables that operationalize cultural factors allowing for analysis through quantitative methods. The study first demonstrates academic success among Chinese Americans when compared with White Americans and then explores the links between social structural positions and cultural components in explaining the apparent academic success of Chinese Americans when compared to White Americans.
机译:在本文中,作者将华裔美国人的学历与白人美国人的学历进行了比较,并在确定最能说明成功的因素时,指出社会结构因素之间存在共通性,而文化资本因素之间则存在明显的差异。 。这篇文章拒绝将少数民族同化作为成功的源泉,并认为中国和白人文化在促进教育方面是和谐的,但却是不同的。少数族裔比喻中最常被吹捧的元素是亚裔美国人的高学业成就。在亚裔美国人中取得高成就的主张并非没有严厉的批评,尤其是在亚裔美国人中所有子群体的全面主张中。但是,当我们隔离诸如华裔美国人之类的群体,或者甚至进一步隔离几代移民时,我们发现学术成就的明显证据至少与白人美国人的成就相当,在某些情况下甚至超过白人。在专门研究华裔美国人时,可以在文献中找到几种类型的解释。两种最广泛的类型集中在被认为有助于成就的结构或文化因素上。就其本质而言,文化解释必须确定一种文化的有益因素,而不是另一种文化的不利或什至有害的因素。结构性解释将重点放在限制行为和限制机会的条件上。这项研究是尝试起草一种方法的第一步,该方法将允许对文化因素进行进一步的定量分析,并最终导致对结构和文化变量与亚洲学者的学业成就和成就之间关系的强度和方向进行全面分析。美国人通过对《 1988-2000年全国教育纵向调查》数据集的二次分析,作者确定了可以使文化因素有效的变量和变量组,从而可以通过定量方法进行分析。该研究首先证明了与白人相比,华裔美国人在学术上的成功,然后探讨了社会结构地位和文化成分之间的联系,从而解释了与白人相比华裔美国人的明显学术成就。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Educational Review》 |2007年第1期|19-36|共18页
  • 作者

    Richard R. Pearce; Zeng Lin;

  • 作者单位

    Illinois Board of Higher Education, Springfield, IL;

    Department of Educational Administration and Foundations, Illinois State University, Normal, IL;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号