...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecotoxicology >Differences in ecological impacts of systemic insecticides with different physicochemical properties on biocenosis of experimental paddy fields
【24h】

Differences in ecological impacts of systemic insecticides with different physicochemical properties on biocenosis of experimental paddy fields

机译:不同理化性质的系统性杀虫剂对实验稻田生物群落的生态影响差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The environmental risks of pesticides are typically determined by laboratory single-species tests based on OECD test guidelines, even if biodiversity should also be taken into consideration. To evaluate how realistic these assessments are, ecological changes caused by the systemic insecticides imidacloprid and fipronil, which have different physicochemical properties, when applied at recommended commercial rates on rice fields were monitored using experimental paddy mesocosms. A total of 178 species were observed. There were no significant differences in abundance of crop arthropods among the experimental paddies. However, zooplankton, benthic and neuston communities in imidacloprid-treated field had significantly less abundance of species than control and fipronil fields. Significant differences in abundance of nekton community were also found between both insecticide-treated paddies and control. Influences on the growth of medaka fish were also found in both adults and their fries. Both Principal Response Curve analysis (PRC) and Detrended Correspondence Analysis (DCA) showed the time series variations in community structure among treatments, in particular for imidacloprid during the middle stage of the experimental period. These results show the ecological effect-concentrations (LOEC ~ 1 μg/l) of these insecticides in mesocosms, especially imidacloprid, are clearly different from their laboratory tests. We suggest that differences in the duration of the recovery process among groups of species are due to different physicochemical properties of the insecticides. Therefore, realistic prediction and assessment of pesticide effects at the community level should consider not only the sensitivity traits and interaction among species but also the differences in physicochemical characteristics of each pesticide.
机译:农药的环境风险通常通过基于OECD测试指南的实验室单种测试来确定,即使也应考虑生物多样性。为了评估这些评估的现实性,使用实验性稻田中观方法监测了稻瘟病性杀虫剂吡虫啉和氟虫腈具有不同的理化特性,并以推荐的商业化比例应用于稻田时,对生态变化进行了监测。总共观察到178种。在实验稻田中,节肢动物的丰度没有显着差异。但是,吡虫啉处理过的田间浮游动物,底栖生物和神经元群落的物种丰富度明显少于对照和氟虫腈田。在杀虫剂处理过的稻田和对照之间,Nekton群落的丰度也存在显着差异。在成年鱼及其薯条中也发现了对鱼生长的影响。主响应曲线分析(PRC)和去趋势对应分析(DCA)均显示了治疗期间社区结构的时间序列变化,尤其是吡虫啉在实验期间的中期。这些结果表明,这些杀虫剂(尤其是吡虫啉)的生态作用浓度(LOEC〜1μg/ l)与实验室测试明显不同。我们认为,不同物种之间恢复过程持续时间的差异是由于杀虫剂的不同理化特性所致。因此,在社区一级对农药影响的现实预测和评估不仅应考虑物种之间的敏感性特征和相互作用,而且还应考虑每种农药的理化特性的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号