首页> 外文期刊>The economist >Paying for war slaves
【24h】

Paying for war slaves

机译:支付战争奴隶

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

If it smells, put a lid on it, goes an old Japanese proverb. But it is the wrong prescription for the 30-odd lawsuits that have been lodged in California against Japanese companies such as Mitsubishi and Mitsui on behalf of many Asians and some Allied prisoners of war who were forced into slave labour during the second world war (see page 59). The response of both the government and the companies to all such claims has been to point to the 1951 San Francisco peace treaty. Besides waiving "all reparation claims of the Allied Powers, other claims of the Allied Powers and their nationals" against Japan, the treaty empowered the allies to seize Japanese property to pay reparations to former servicemen. By 1952, America had seized $9om of Japanese assets and paid some of it to former prisoners of war. Germany made no such settlement after its defeat, says Japan, so the $5.2 billion fund organised by its government last year to compensate wartime slave labourers is not a precedent.
机译:如果闻起来,盖上盖子,传出一句古老的日本谚语。但这是对在加利福尼亚州代表许多亚洲人和第二次世界大战期间被迫沦为奴隶劳工的一些亚洲同盟和一些战俘的日本公司(例如三菱和三井)提起30多次诉讼的错误处方(请参阅第59页)。政府和公司对所有此类主张的反应都指向1951年《旧金山和平条约》。除了放弃对日本的“同盟国的所有赔偿要求,同盟国及其国民的其他要求”之外,该条约还授权盟国没收日本财产,向前军人支付赔偿。到1952年,美国已夺取了9百万美元的日本资产,并将其中的一部分支付给了战俘。日本说,德国在战败后没有做出任何和解,因此,德国政府去年组织了52亿美元的基金,用以补偿战时奴隶工。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2000年第8178期|p.20|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 经济;各科经济学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:33:52

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号