首页> 外文期刊>The economist >Can you dig it?
【24h】

Can you dig it?

机译:你能挖一下它么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The first-world-war battlefields of Belgium and France are dangerous places where, even today, unexploded shells lurk, making excavation a potentially lethal activity. But as archaeologists pick up their trowels, they must consider more than their personal safety. For the trenches, dugouts and tunnels―many containing human remains and personal belongings-are ethical minefields too. In a paper in this month's Antiquity, Nicholas Saunders, an anthropologist at University College, London, says that archaeologists on these battlefields face a concentration of all the issues that have concerned archaeology in the past ten to 15 years. These ethical concerns fall into three broad areas. First, there is the question of how to treat human remains. Over the past few years, archaeologists have often come into conflict with indigenous peoples over the custody and handling of excavated human remains. In Belgium and France the situation is particularly complex because the allied armies included soldiers from a variety of faiths and ethnicities, including Africans, Indians, Australians and Native Americans, all of whose traditions may prefer to treat remains differently.
机译:比利时和法国的第一次世界大战战场是危险的地方,即使在今天,未爆炸的炮弹也潜伏在其中,挖掘工作可能具有致命的危险。但是,随着考古学家拾起刀,他们必须考虑的不仅仅是个人安全。对于战,、挖坑和隧道-其中许多人的遗骸和个人物品-也是道德的雷区。伦敦大学学院的人类学家尼古拉斯·桑德斯(Nicholas Saunders)在本月上古的一篇论文中说,这些战场上的考古学家面临着过去10至15年中与考古有关的所有问题。这些道德问题可分为三个主要领域。首先,存在如何处理人类遗体的问题。在过去的几年中,考古学家经常就保管和处理挖掘出的人类遗骸与土著人民发生冲突。在比利时和法国,情况特别复杂,因为盟军包括来自各种信仰和种族的士兵,包括非洲人,印第安人,澳大利亚人和美洲原住民,他们所有的传统都希望以不同方式对待。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号