首页> 外文期刊>The economist >Mixed opinions
【24h】

Mixed opinions

机译:意见不一

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A year has passed since Wall Street firms settled with Eliot Spitzer, New York state's attorney-general, and other regulators, over conflicts of interest in their equity research. Enormous sums of money are still at stake, in lawsuits brought on behalf of private investors. It seems that winning and losing may come down to which judge is assigned to each case. So far, Merrill Lynch seems to have hit the jackpot. All the litigation against it has been consolidated in New York under Milton Pollack, a federal judge who believes that there is no case to answer. Others have been less lucky: Lehman Brothers suffered a nasty setback last month when another federal judge in the same judicial district in lower Manhattan, Jed Rakoff, allowed litigation against it to proceed. These are, of course, early days; but because the stakes are so high, defendants on the end of adverse rulings are under great pressure to settle. It may well be that none of the civil cases lasts long enough to be decided by a jury.
机译:自华尔街公司与纽约州总检察长艾略特·斯皮策和其他监管机构和解以来,已经过去了一年。在代表私人投资者提起的诉讼中,大量资金仍然处于危险之中。似乎胜负可能取决于每个案件的法官。到目前为止,美林证券似乎已经中奖了。联邦法官米尔顿·波拉克(Milton Pollack)在纽约合并了所有针对它的诉讼,他认为没有理由要回答。其他人则没有那么幸运:雷曼兄弟上个月遭受了令人讨厌的挫折,当时曼哈顿下城同一司法区的另一名联邦法官杰德·拉科夫(Jed Rakoff)允许对其提起诉讼。这些当然是早期的日子。但是由于赌注如此之高,被告在不利裁定结束时承受着巨大的和解压力。很可能没有一个民事案件能持续足够长的时间来由陪审团裁决。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2004年第8372期|p.91|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 经济;各科经济学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:32:44

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号