【24h】

Blair-baiting

机译:布莱尔诱饵

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

It Is becoming clearer by the day that the threatened rebellion over university tuition fees, when the vote takes place on January 27th, will have less to do with the future of higher education than with the desire to wound Tony Blair, preferably mortally. No doubt, a good many of the 160 Labour MPS who signed a House of Commons motion back in November attacking variable fees had genuine concerns about the effect of the proposed legislation on university access. Quite a few were hostile in a knee-jerk sort of way simply because they had not taken the trouble to understand exactly what the government was trying to do and why it was important. Others were hoping to force financial concessions to allay their anxiety that poorer students might be deterred from going to university by the prospect of taking on large debts. Although manifestos are hardly sacred texts, a handful of the rebels may even have been genuinely offended by what they (legitimately) saw as a breach of the promise in 2001 not to bring in top-up fees.
机译:越来越清楚的是,在1月27日投票表决时,有关大学学费的威胁性叛乱,与高等教育的未来关系不大,而与伤害托尼·布莱尔,最好是致命性的愿望无关。毫无疑问,去年11月签署了一项下议院议案的160名工党议员中的许多人,他们对可变收费提出了真正的担忧,因为该法案对大学准入的影响。相当一部分人对这种行为充满敌意,只是因为他们没有费力去确切了解政府正在试图做什么以及为什么它很重要。其他人则希望强迫财政减免以减轻他们的忧虑,即较贫穷的学生可能因承担巨额债务而无法上大学。尽管宣言几乎不是神圣的文本,但少数叛乱分子甚至被他们(合法地)认为在2001年违反了不收取充值费的承诺而真正冒犯了。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2004年第8358期|p.30|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 经济;各科经济学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:32:40
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号