首页> 外文期刊>The economist >Victory designed by committee
【24h】

Victory designed by committee

机译:委员会设计的胜利

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

One of the many virtues of Andrew Roberts's new history of grand strategy during the second world war is to vindicate that much maligned British way of doing things: the committee. The author employs a vast range of contemporary dia-ries-as well as newly discovered verbatim accounts of cabinet meetings which reveal what was not in the official minutes-to reconstruct the marathon meetings which, no less than the allies' prodigious resources, ultimately determined the difference between victory and defeat.rnHistorians of Germany will be struck that there was no equivalent process in Hitler's headquarters, where every bad idea went unchallenged by generals who knew better but were cowed by a splenetic maniac. Perhaps that bureaucratic deficit explains why Germany's otherwise superior fighting men (a point Winston Churchill repeatedly acknowledged in private) were defeated by an enemy that was slow to acquire equivalent ferocity and tenacity?
机译:第二次世界大战期间安德鲁·罗伯茨(Andrew Roberts)的新的大战略历史的许多优点之一就是证明英国的做法十分残酷:委员会。作者运用了大量的现代日记本以及新发现的内阁会议逐字记录,以揭示官方记录中没有的内容,以重建马拉松会议,而马拉松会议的最终资源不少于盟国。胜利与失败之间的区别。德国历史学家会感到震惊的是,希特勒的总部没有一个类似的过程,那里的每个坏主意都不会受到将领们的挑战,这些将领们更懂事,但却被脾气暴躁的疯子吓倒了。也许这种官僚主义的赤字可以解释为什么德国原本比较优秀的战斗人员(温斯顿·丘吉尔私下多次承认这一点)却被敌军打败了,而敌人却难以获得同等的凶猛和坚韧?

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2008年第8600期|106|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:31:30

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号