首页> 外文期刊>The economist >Fairness for firefighters
【24h】

Fairness for firefighters

机译:消防员的公平

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

They celebrated with a Stars-and-Stripes-iced cake. On June 29th the Supreme Court ruled in favour of white and Hispanic firefighters who were discriminated against by the city of New Haven, Connecticut. Six years ago the city put them through an exam to decide whom to promote. When no black scored highly enough, it scrapped the test and promoted no one. The passed-over firefighters sued.rnThe city said the test must have been unfair. By a 5-4 majority, the Supreme Court disagreed, finding it both fair and relevant. The ruling added a little clarity to America's incomprehensible racial laws. Employers sometimes face a Catch-22: they are barred from treating employees differently because of their race, but forbidden from treating everyone the same if that has a "disparate impact" on one group.
机译:他们用星条旗结冰蛋糕庆祝。 6月29日,最高法院裁定赞成由康涅狄格州纽黑文市歧视的白人和西班牙裔消防员。六年前,这座城市对他们进行了考试,以确定晋升对象。当没有黑人获得足够高的分数时,它放弃了考试并且没有晋升任何人。越过的消防员提起诉讼。市政府说测试一定是不公平的。最高法院以5票对4票的反对意见不同意,认为这既公平又相关。这项裁决使美国难以理解的种族法律更加清晰。雇主有时会面临Catch-22:由于种族原因,他们被禁止以不同的方式对待雇员,但是如果对每个人产生“不同的影响”,则他们被禁止平等对待所有人。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2009年第8638期|39-39|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:30:56

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号