首页> 外文期刊>The economist >Huntington's Clash
【24h】

Huntington's Clash

机译:亨廷顿的冲突

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the early 1990s America's opinion-makers competed to outdo each other in triumphalism. Economists argued that the "Washington consensus" would spread peace and prosperity around the world. Politicians debated whether the "peace dividend" should be used to create universal health care or be allowed to fructify in the pockets of the people or quite possibly both. Francis Fukuyama took the optimists' garland by declaring, in 1992, "the end of history" and the universal triumph of Western liberalism.rnSamuel Huntington thought that all this was bunk. In "The Clash of Civilisations?" he presented a darker view. He argued that the old ideological divisions of the Cold War would be replaced not by universal harmony but by even older cultural divisions. The world was deeply divided between different civilisations. And far from being drawn together by globalisation, these different cultures were being drawn into conflict.
机译:在1990年代初期,美国的舆论竞争者在凯旋主义的竞争中相互超越。经济学家认为,“华盛顿共识”将在世界范围内传播和平与繁荣。政客们争论着是否应该使用“和平红利”来建立全民医疗保健体系,还是应该在人民的口袋里实现“和平红利”?弗朗西斯·福山(Francis Fukuyama)在1992年宣告“历史的终结”和西方自由主义的普遍胜利夺走了乐观主义者的花环。塞缪尔·亨廷顿(Samuel Huntington)认为这一切都是铺垫。在“文明的冲突?”中他提出了一个更黑暗的观点。他认为,冷战以前的意识形态分裂将不会被普遍和谐所取代,而是会被更古老的文化分裂所取代。世界在不同文明之间深深地分裂。这些不同的文化远没有被全球化融合在一起,而是陷入了冲突。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2009年第8612期|33|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:30:46

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号