首页> 外文期刊>The economist >Still restrictive
【24h】

Still restrictive

机译:仍然限制性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Irish Supreme Court ruled 21 years ago that abortion was legal if the risk that pregnancy might prompt suicide put the life of a woman in grave danger. The case involved a sexually abused and suicidal teenager whom the lower courts stopped from travelling to England for an abortion, a decision the Supreme Court reversed. Yet successive governments ignored the court's decision. Ireland still has one of the rich world's most restrictive abortion regimes. Every year over 4,000 Irish women go to Britain to terminate their pregnancies: a British solution to an Irish problem.Three years ago, however, the European Court of Human Rights embarrassed the politicians into taking action by calling on Ireland to clarify its abortion law. More recently, the debate was reignited by an international outcry when an Indian-born dentist died in a Galway hospital after a miscarriage, despite her repeated requests for an abortion.
机译:爱尔兰最高法院21年前裁定,如果怀孕可能导致自杀的风险使妇女的生命处于严重危险中,堕胎是合法的。该案涉及一名性虐待和自杀的少年,最高法院驳回了下级法院阻止其前往英国堕胎的决定。然而,历届政府都忽略了法院的判决。爱尔兰仍然是世界上限制性最强的堕胎制度之一。每年有4,000多名爱尔兰妇女前往英国终止怀孕:这是英国对爱尔兰问题的解决方案。然而,三年前,欧洲人权法院令政治家们尴尬地采取行动,呼吁爱尔兰澄清其堕胎法。最近,国际上的强烈抗议引发了辩论,一名印度出生的牙医尽管多次要求堕胎,但在流产后死于高威医院。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2013年第8821期|46-46|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:29:06

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号