【24h】

Pay-per trade

机译:贸易

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

FROM ONE perspective, retail stock traders have never had it so good. There is fierce competition among brokers, including the likes of Charles Schwab and Fidelity, for their business. This broke out into an all-out price war in 2019 when these firms cut stock-trading commissions to zero, four years after Robinhood, a startup promising commission-free trading, came on the scene. Retail participation in stock trading is at a new high. This happy picture is somewhat muddied by the practice of payment for order flow (PFOF). Instead of charging users for each trade, brokers are paid by marketmak-ers to direct users' trades-or "order flow"-through them. Marketmakers take small profits on the difference between the price that a broker's user pays and that at which a share is offered for sale in the market. The mania around GameStop, a seller of video games, has put the practice, and its practitioners, in the spotlight.
机译:从一个角度来看,零售业股票交易员从未如此美好。 经纪人之间存在激烈的竞争,包括Charles Schwab和Fidelity的喜欢,为他们的业务。 这将在2019年爆发出全外的价格战,当这些公司将股票交易佣金削减到零,罗杰赫时四年,一个有前途的委员会的佣金贸易,来到现场。 零售参与股票交易处于新的高位。 这张幸福的照片有点浑浊的订单流量(PFOF)的做法。 代替每次交易的用户,经纪人由MarketMak-ers支付,以指示用户的交易 - 或“订单流” - 延伸。 市场制造商对经纪人的用户支付的价格之间的差异,以及在市场上出售提供份额的价格之间的差异。 GameStop周围的狂热,视频游戏卖家,在聚光灯下,将实践及其从业者带来了练习。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2021年第9231期|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号