首页> 外文期刊>The economist >Free exchange | A bug problem
【24h】

Free exchange | A bug problem

机译:免费交换| 一个错误问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

THERE ARE both petty and respectable explanations for China's assault on Ant Group. The fintech giant was less than 48 hours away from the world's biggest initial public offering when regulators halted it in November-the first in a series of moves aimed at taming the fast-growing firm. The petty is that Jack Ma, Ant's outspoken founder, had offended Chinese leaders with a blunt speech. The respectable is that the government needed to act because Ant threatened financial stability. As a state newspaper recently put it, Ant had become "too big to fail", presenting itself as a tech firm but pumping out loans. The petty explanation, to the extent that it is right, can be dismissed as a China-specific problem, a reflection of the Communist Party's tightening grip on tycoons. But the respectable explanation deserves a hearing, not least because of its global resonance. As Apple, Facebook and Google get into payments and more, the question of how to regulate Big Tech on its forays into finance will become all the more prominent.
机译:对中国对蚂蚁群体的攻击既有小小而可观的解释。当监管机构在11月份停止时,Fintech Giant距离世界上最大的首次公开发售不到48小时,这是一系列旨在驯服快速增长公司的一系列动作。小杰克马,蚂蚁的直言不讳的创始人,冒犯了中国领导人,言语钝。可敬的是,政府需要采取行动,因为蚂蚁威胁到金融稳定性。作为一个州报纸最近,蚂蚁已经“太大而无法失败”,作为一个技术公司,但抽出贷款。小小的解释,在这是正确的情况下,可以被视为一个中国特定问题,反映了共产党收紧抓住泰国的抓地力。但可敬的解释值得听取听证会,尤其是因为其全球共鸣。作为Apple,Facebook和Google达成付款,更多的问题,如何向财务中的Forays进行规范,将变得更加突出。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2021年第9226期|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号