首页> 外文期刊>The economist >The wrong reaction
【24h】

The wrong reaction

机译:错误的反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

SNUGGLED ANID lush fields and forests, Namie was doomed by its proximity to the local power plant. In 2011 the town's 21,000 residents were ordered to evacuate after a tsunami overwhelmed the Fuku-shima nuclear facility 4km away. Soon after, all 54 reactors in Japan were shut down amid safety fears, winking out nearly 50 gigawatts of generating capacity. A new paper* argues that that decision may have cost far more lives than the initial disaster. The Fukushima accident led to a surge in imports of coal, gas and oil. In the four years after the meltdown, the share of generation from fossil fuels leapt from 62% to 88%. Nuclear power, which once produced over 30% of Japan's electricity, fell to zero. The result, say three academics, was a sharp spike in electricity prices.
机译:娜米(NAMIE)散布在茂密的田野和森林中,靠近当地发电厂注定要失败。 2011年,由于海啸淹没了4公里外的福岛核设施,该镇的21,000名居民被命令撤离。此后不久,由于担心安全问题,日本的所有54座反应堆都被关闭,产生了近50吉瓦的发电量。一篇新论文*指出,这一决定可能比最初的灾难造成更多的生命损失。福岛事故导致煤炭,天然气和石油进口激增。危机发生后的四年中,化石燃料发电的份额从62%跃升至88%。核能曾经占日本电力的30%以上,如今已降至零。三位学者说,结果是电价急剧上涨。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2019年第9168期|24-24|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 04:57:52

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号