首页> 外文期刊>Economics letters >Preference domains and the monotonicity of condorcet extensions
【24h】

Preference domains and the monotonicity of condorcet extensions

机译:偏好域和condorcet扩展的单调性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

An alternative is a Condorcet winner if it beats all other alternatives in a pairwise majority vote. A social choice correspondence is a Condorcet extension if it selects the Condorcet winners and nothing else - whenever a Condorcet winner exists. It is well known that Condorcet extensions are not monotonic (hence, not Nash implementable) when all preferences are admissible, but are implementable when restricted to a domain in which Condorcet winners always exist. We fill the gap by studying the intermediate domains and find that monotonicity is violated on all such domains. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:如果它以成对多数票击败所有其他选择,则是Condorcet赢家。如果选择了Condorcet获胜者,并且没有其他选择,则社交选择对应关系是Condorcet扩展名-每当存在Condorcet获胜者时。众所周知,当所有首选项都被接受时,Condorcet扩展名不是单调的(因此,不是Nash可执行的),但是当仅限于Condorcet获胜者始终存在的域时,则可以实现。我们通过研究中间域来填补空白,并发现在所有此类域上都违反了单调性。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号