首页> 外文期刊>Economics letters >The household fallacy
【24h】

The household fallacy

机译:家庭谬误

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We refer to the idea that government must 'tighten its belt' as a necessary policy response to higher indebtedness as the household fallacy. We provide a reason to be skeptical of this claim that holds even if the economy always operates at full employment and all markets clear. Our argument rests on the fact that, in an overlapping-generations (OLG) model, changes in government debt cause changes in the real interest rate that redistribute the burden of repayment across generations. We do not rely on the assumption that the equilibrium is dynamically inefficient, and our argument holds in a version of the OLG model where the real interest rate is always positive. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:我们指的是政府必须“收紧腰带”的想法,这是对因家庭谬误而导致债务增加的必要政策。我们提供了一个对这种说法持怀疑态度的理由,即使经济始终处于充分就业状态并且所有市场都畅通无阻。我们的论据基于这样一个事实,在重叠世代(OLG)模型中,政府债务的变化会导致实际利率的变化,从而重新分配各代人的还款负担。我们不依赖于均衡在动态上是无效的假设,而我们的论点适用于实际利率始终为正的OLG模型。 (C)2018 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号