首页> 外文期刊>Economics letters >When is a talent contest not a talent contest? Sequential performance bias in expert evaluation
【24h】

When is a talent contest not a talent contest? Sequential performance bias in expert evaluation

机译:才能比赛什么时候不是人才竞赛?专家评估中的顺序性能偏见

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study extends earlier work identifying sequence order biases in contest outcomes determined solely by popular voting. Results for different contest evaluation formats are empirically scrutinised, where both expert panel scoring and popular voting determine contest ranking. Forms of sequence order bias exist separately in the expert panel voting even though they are undertaken after each individual performance, as well as in the popular vote at the end of the contest. We suggest that the biases observed in the expert voting can be explained as a type of 'grade inflation'. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:本研究延伸了较早的工作识别竞争结果中的序列偏差,仅通过流行投票确定。不同竞争评估格式的结果是经验审查的,专家组专家面板评分和流行的投票决定了比赛排名。即使在每个绩效之后进行,也存在序列偏见的形式偏见在专家面板投票中存在,以及在比赛结束时的流行投票中进行。我们建议在专家投票中观察到的偏差可以作为一种“成绩通胀”来解释。 (c)2019 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号