...
首页> 外文期刊>Economic systems >Relative deprivation, reference groups and the assessment of standard of living
【24h】

Relative deprivation, reference groups and the assessment of standard of living

机译:相对贫困,参考群体和生活水平评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper proposes two new indices of relative deprivation, derived from an extension of the concept of generalized Gini to the measurement of distributional change. Population- and income-weighted relative deprivation indices are then defined and, using panel data from the Consortium of Household Panels for European Socio-Economic Research (CHER), we check which of the various ways of defining individual deprivation best fits the answers given by individuals on the degree of their satisfaction with income. We find that the deprivation indices proposed are consistently and negatively correlated with income satisfaction as reported by respondents, that income weighted measures fit better than population weighted measures and that this fit improves with countries that experienced deep institutional changes such as the transitional economies of Eastern Europe.
机译:本文提出了两个新的相对剥夺指数,这些指数是从广义基尼概念的扩展到分布变化的度量得出的。然后定义了人口和收入加权的相对贫困指数,并使用欧洲社会经济研究家庭联合会(CHER)的面板数据,我们检查了定义个体贫困的各种方式中哪一种最符合个人对收入的满意程度。我们发现,如受访者所报告的那样,提议的贫困指数与收入满意度一直呈负相关,收入加权指标比人口加权指标更合适,并且随着经历了深刻的制度变革的国家(如东欧转型经济国家),这种加权指标也得到了改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号