...
首页> 外文期刊>Economic modelling >To tax or not to tax? When does it matter for informality?
【24h】

To tax or not to tax? When does it matter for informality?

机译:要征税还是不征税?什么时候对非正式有关系?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Theoretical models generally always predict or assume that higher taxes lead to larger informal sectors. Empirically, however, there is considerable debate on the effect of taxes on informality. In this paper I show that whether a positive, negative or non-relation arises between tax rates and informality depends on the degree of tax enforcement and the level of credit market development in an economy. Higher enforcement implies a higher probability of detection and punishment while more credit implies better formal sector access to finance. Both are incentives to become formal. In a two-sector dynamic general equilibrium model with borrowing constraints, I show that informality rises with the tax rate up to a threshold level of tax enforcement beyond which it falls as tax increases. This enforcement threshold depends negatively on the level of credit in the economy.
机译:理论模型通常总是预测或假设更高的税收会导致更大的非正式部门。但是,从经验上讲,关于税收对非正规性的影响存在很多争论。在本文中,我表明税率与非正规性之间是正,负还是不相关,取决于经济中税收执行的程度和信贷市场的发展水平。更高的执行力意味着更高的侦查和惩罚可能性,而更多的信贷则意味着更好的正规部门获得融资的机会。两者都是成为正式的诱因。在具有借款约束的两部门动态一般均衡模型中,我表明,非正式性随着税率上升到税收执行的阈值水平而上升,超过该阈值水平则随着税收增加而下降。该执行门槛与经济中的信贷水平负相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号