首页> 外文期刊>The economic journal >DOES COLLECTIVE WAGE BARGAINING RESTORE EFFICIENCY IN A SEARCH MODEL WITH LARGE FIRMS?
【24h】

DOES COLLECTIVE WAGE BARGAINING RESTORE EFFICIENCY IN A SEARCH MODEL WITH LARGE FIRMS?

机译:在具有大企业的搜索模型中,集体工资谈判的恢复效率吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Existing search and bargaining models show that firms hire an inefficiently large number of workers. We ask whether decentralised collective wage bargaining may result in a second-best allocation. Collective bargaining restores efficiency when the bargained wage is independent of employment; conditions that we characterise. Firms then behave as if collective bargaining was over both wages and employment, thus linking the large-firm search and bargaining environment to the efficient bargaining model (McDonald and Solow, 1981). Under more realistic conditions, workers can bargain for a share of output, so that the wage is then a function of employment. In equilibrium, firms are too large and firm entry is inefficient.
机译:现有的搜索和讨价还价模型表明,公司雇用的工人数量低效。我们问分散的集体工资谈判是否会导致次优分配。当讨价还价的工资与就业无关时,集体谈判可恢复效率;我们表征的条件。然后,企业的行为就好像集体谈判既涉及工资又涉及就业,从而将大型企业的搜寻和谈判环境与有效的谈判模型联系起来(McDonald and Solow,1981)。在更现实的条件下,工人可以讨价还价,以使工资成为就业的函数。在均衡状态下,企业规模过大,企业进入效率低下。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economic journal》 |2014年第579期|1066-1085|共20页
  • 作者

    Christian Bauer; Joerg Lingens;

  • 作者单位

    University of Munich and CESifo;

    Department of Economics, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号